Ohio State Buckeyes
Rankings
| User | Rank | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Fmeson | 2 | |
| r0sco | 2 | |
| placid_salad | 3 | LW: #2 Surprisingly still #3, 6-2 with the best win among the top 3 over Indiana, another strong win over #28 Iowa, and not hampered too much by a 1-point road loss to another top 10 team. No losses or close games against low-ranked teams to weigh them down, at least not yet |
LW: #2 Surprisingly still #3, 6-2 with the best win among the top 3 over Indiana, another strong win over #28 Iowa, and not hampered too much by a 1-point road loss to another top 10 team. No losses or close games against low-ranked teams to weigh them down, at least not yet |
||
| JeromesNiece | 5 | |
| tdoger | 5 | |
| dubscurry30 | 6 | -4 |
-4 |
||
| HieloLuz | 6 | Ohio State has a very similar resume to Alabama, with wins over Indiana and Iowa, and losses to a pair of good teams, but their loss to USC wasn't close which gives Bama the edge this week. |
Ohio State has a very similar resume to Alabama, with wins over Indiana and Iowa, and losses to a pair of good teams, but their loss to USC wasn't close which gives Bama the edge this week. |
||
| jbowen1 | 6 | |
| mthompson2320 | 6 | LW: 2 |
LW: 2 |
||
| PlactusTX | 6 |
LW: 1 | Tier 2 | L Southern California |
LW: 1 | Tier 2 | L Southern California |
||
| sirgippy | 6 | GippyRank Quality of Results expected rank: 8.7. Central 80% interval: 2–18. Top-25 probability: 96.6%. |
GippyRank Quality of Results expected rank: 8.7. Central 80% interval: 2–18. Top-25 probability: 96.6%. |
||
| stripes361 | 6 | |
| SwissArmyScythe | 6 | -5 |
-5 |
||
| visor841 | 6 | |
| Bereft13 | 7 | Power: 4, SoR: 13; LW: 2 |
Power: 4, SoR: 13; LW: 2 |
||
| BuckeyeForLife95 | 7 | 5.51 |
5.51 |
||
| BUSean | 7 | |
| Conglossian | 7 | -5 |
-5 |
||
| jalexjsmithj | 7 | |
| jthomas694 | 7 | |
| laprasrules | 7 | |
| Maladroit44 | 7 | |
| ManiacalBlazer | 7 | 84.235 |
84.235 |
||
| blahblehblahwhoru | 8 | |
| Blooblod | 8 | |
| Charlemagne42 | 8 | 115 |
115 |
||
| ChBass | 8 | Ohio State is power rated #1 by the model; it has the best offense in cfb and a top-10 defense, and the sole win against Indiana, which was completely negated by the loss to USC. |
Ohio State is power rated #1 by the model; it has the best offense in cfb and a top-10 defense, and the sole win against Indiana, which was completely negated by the loss to USC. |
||
| Chipsahoy523 | 8 | -6 |
-6 |
||
| CRedds19 | 8 | |
| dschinghiskhan | 8 | |
| Jakesnake42 | 8 | Turns out the QB position may be important to winning. Loss this week doesn't erase the work they've done beating IU and Iowa earlier in the year but the upcoming schedule could kill the Buckeyes. Last Week: #2 |
Turns out the QB position may be important to winning. Loss this week doesn't erase the work they've done beating IU and Iowa earlier in the year but the upcoming schedule could kill the Buckeyes. Last Week: #2 |
||
| PeteyNice | 8 | |
| Player_1_has_Joined | 8 | |
| retnuh101 | 8 | |
| TadKosciuszko | 8 | |
| The-Gothic-Castle | 8 | |
| tomdawg0022 | 8 | |
| TouchdownHeroes | 8 | |
| True_Ad5324 | 8 | Down 6 |
Down 6 |
||
| Wescat | 8 | |
| zenverak | 8 | |
| 12panther | 9 | |
| CFBHurts | 9 | |
| Darth_Ra | 9 | |
| fredmerc111 | 9 | |
| frumious88 | 9 | |
| halldaylong | 9 | |
| redwave2505 | 9 | |
| RegionalBias | 9 | |
| Sometimeswelose | 9 | |
| TimeBroken | 9 | |
| Acm0028 | 10 | |
| BallSoHerd | 10 | |
| bwburke94 | 10 | +8.0018284 (LW: #5) |
+8.0018284 (LW: #5) |
||
| Colton3690 | 10 | |
| DampFrijoles | 10 | |
| elnino550 | 10 | |
| frone | 10 | |
| fshi | 10 | |
| hythloday1 | 10 | |
| MainPeanut25 | 10 | Way to go, lost to Lincoln Riley and it wasn’t even the true freshman QB’s fault |
Way to go, lost to Lincoln Riley and it wasn’t even the true freshman QB’s fault |
||
| mcdsmaster8824 | 10 | |
| monkeymatt1836 | 10 | |
| OKgolfer | 10 | LW: 4 (lost at USC). Top 2-loss team. |
LW: 4 (lost at USC). Top 2-loss team. |
||
| Polarbear1914 | 10 | |
| redrumsoxLoL | 10 | |
| romulusjsp | 10 | |
| SpadeRyker | 10 | |
| Striker743 | 10 | Down 7 - lost to decent team on road |
Down 7 - lost to decent team on road |
||
| the_neverdoctor | 10 | |
| tjstanley | 10 | |
| AlphaH4wk | 11 | |
| arbadak | 11 | .816 rating, 6-2, SOS .632 (-8) |
.816 rating, 6-2, SOS .632 (-8) |
||
| BananaBouquet | 11 | |
| bernkastel87 | 11 | |
| boxbeat | 11 | |
| brucewaynewins | 11 | |
| ChaseTheFalcon | 11 | |
| Daigotsu | 11 | |
| diehardcubforever | 11 | |
| Drexlore | 11 | |
| dukemetoo | 11 | |
| e8odie | 11 | |
| EpicSchwinn | 11 | |
| GatorBolt | 11 | |
| GenialGiant | 11 | |
| HelioOne | 11 | |
| HideNZeke | 11 | |
| Hobbes_121 | 11 | |
| joebob431 | 11 | |
| jonstark19 | 11 | |
| Justanother_0 | 11 | The Indiana win is saving them here, but Ohio State will be lucky to even be ranked come December if the same team that showed up against USC shows up for the remainder of their games. |
The Indiana win is saving them here, but Ohio State will be lucky to even be ranked come December if the same team that showed up against USC shows up for the remainder of their games. |
||
| KansasEF5Tornado | 11 | |
| kflinderman | 11 | |
| Lex_Ludorum | 11 | |
| MahjongDaily | 11 | |
| olmsted | 11 | |
| Our-Gardian-Angel | 11 | |
| Pikachu1989 | 11 | |
| pileatedloon | 11 | |
| Pollaski | 11 | |
| roguebandit1 | 11 | |
| samspopguy | 11 | |
| scronko | 11 | |
| TheUltimate721 | 11 | |
| TheZachster | 11 | |
| TossedRightOut | 11 | |
| udderlymoovelous | 11 | |
| Versigot | 11 | |
| AlexanderComet | 12 | |
| ALStark69 | 12 | -10; maybe an overreaction but woof guys |
-10; maybe an overreaction but woof guys |
||
| bakonydraco | 12 | 89.666 (6-2) |
89.666 (6-2) |
||
| BearsAreGreat1 | 12 | |
| BendrickLamar19 | 12 | |
| bladefencer | 12 | 0.875, -8, Pow: 9, Off: 10, Def: 9, SOR: 16 |
0.875, -8, Pow: 9, Off: 10, Def: 9, SOR: 16 |
||
| BorisNumber1 | 12 | |
| BosskOnASegway | 12 | 1873.8 -> 1786.7 [-87.1] (#5 -> #12) |
1873.8 -> 1786.7 [-87.1] (#5 -> #12) |
||
| BoukenGreen | 12 | |
| bretticus733 | 12 | |
| Buckeyes2010 | 12 | |
| Casaiir | 12 | |
| cfbguy | 12 | |
| chweris | 12 | |
| CommodoreN7 | 12 | |
| conchobor | 12 | |
| DavoinShower-handle | 12 | |
| ehoefler | 12 | 88.68 | -7 |
88.68 | -7 |
||
| ExternalTangents | 12 | 74.5% |
74.5% |
||
| grey_pilgrim_ | 12 | |
| Hackasizlak | 12 | |
| hascogrande | 12 | |
| Helifino | 12 | |
| Hugefootballfan44 | 12 | |
| IceColdDrPepper_Here | 12 | |
| jimbobbypaul | 12 | |
| jjjoebox | 12 | |
| JustinMSU21 | 12 | |
| luckroy | 12 | |
| malowry0124 | 12 | |
| mellolizard | 12 | |
| nbingham196 | 12 | |
| nemoran | 12 | |
| nin478 | 12 | |
| PattyKane16 | 12 | |
| ruwisc | 12 | |
| Shion314 | 12 | |
| SIMBONEGTP | 12 | |
| SlaminSammons | 12 | |
| SufferingfOrLife | 12 | |
| thomasosu | 12 | |
| TolkienFan71 | 12 | |
| Tornadohunter24 | 12 |
[6-2, 4-1 B1G] (-10) | SOR: #9 | Notable Results: L 23-24 @ #11 Texas [6-2], W 31-14 @ #19 Iowa [6-2], W 19-15 @ #7 Indiana [7-1], L 18-30 @ #17 USC [7-2] | Having to start a backup QB is a rough scenario for any team, but if there was any squad designed around making the transition as seamless as it could be, it'd be the Buckeyes. Or, at least I thought so, until this past weekend. Even with the advantage of a bye and the most talented receiver room in the nation, the rest of the squad's glaring issues (weaker trenches, poor playcalling, poor game management) came to light in glaringly obvious fashion in a rainy, muddy affair in Los Angeles. The typically solid defense crumbled under the assault of Maiava's arm (and some impressive agility from his receivers and tight ends) and the Buckeyes now face a near-must win out scenario to keep themselves alive in the B1G Title race. Fahey will have to take the next step and quickly, or more questions will be asked of Ryan Day by the Lunatic Fringe. |
[6-2, 4-1 B1G] (-10) | SOR: #9 | Notable Results: L 23-24 @ #11 Texas [6-2], W 31-14 @ #19 Iowa [6-2], W 19-15 @ #7 Indiana [7-1], L 18-30 @ #17 USC [7-2] | Having to start a backup QB is a rough scenario for any team, but if there was any squad designed around making the transition as seamless as it could be, it'd be the Buckeyes. Or, at least I thought so, until this past weekend. Even with the advantage of a bye and the most talented receiver room in the nation, the rest of the squad's glaring issues (weaker trenches, poor playcalling, poor game management) came to light in glaringly obvious fashion in a rainy, muddy affair in Los Angeles. The typically solid defense crumbled under the assault of Maiava's arm (and some impressive agility from his receivers and tight ends) and the Buckeyes now face a near-must win out scenario to keep themselves alive in the B1G Title race. Fahey will have to take the next step and quickly, or more questions will be asked of Ryan Day by the Lunatic Fringe. |
||
| WarEagle9 | 12 | |
| xX_GIGA_MAN_Xx | 12 | (-10) |
(-10) |
||
| Zloggt | 12 | |
| 0010MK | 13 | |
| a_bit_of_a_misnomer_ | 13 | |
| AJ_CC | 13 | |
| AllHawkeyesGoToHell | 13 | |
| Bank_Gothic | 13 | |
| bannista7 | 13 | |
| CambodianDrywall | 13 | |
| Cars-and-Coffee | 13 | |
| Cassiyus | 13 | |
| Cecil_Hardboner | 13 | |
| CptCheese | 13 | |
| cyclonepsycho | 13 | |
| dabul-master | 13 | |
| deadtofall12 | 13 | |
| eclectic_tastes | 13 | |
| Euphoric_Relative_13 | 13 | |
| ewolfy13 | 13 | |
| flyingcircusdog | 13 | |
| galacticdude7 | 13 |
Predicted Record: 10-2 Losses: @Texas (23-24), @USC (18-30) Comment: I'm not all that high on USC right now, so this loss really lowers my perception of Ohio State. Not enough to predict that they'll lose any further games this regular season though, but enough to drop them around the same level of Texas, which due to head to head results required me to rank them below Texas. |
Predicted Record: 10-2 Losses: @Texas (23-24), @USC (18-30) Comment: I'm not all that high on USC right now, so this loss really lowers my perception of Ohio State. Not enough to predict that they'll lose any further games this regular season though, but enough to drop them around the same level of Texas, which due to head to head results required me to rank them below Texas. |
||
| Klaassy23 | 13 | |
| Longvols | 13 | |
| Luigiatl | 13 | |
| MemeLovingLoser | 13 | Score 76.01 (▼ 5.04) | Place Change: ▼ 9 | Previous Rank: 4th | Wins Composite Rank: 19th | SoS Composite Rank: 4th | Margin of Victory Rank: 8th | Penalties Composite Rank: 80th | Yardage Composite Rank: 3rd | Turnover Composite Rank: 47th | 3rd/4th Down Conversion Rank: 25th | Other Stats Rank: 94th |
Score 76.01 (▼ 5.04) | Place Change: ▼ 9 | Previous Rank: 4th | Wins Composite Rank: 19th | SoS Composite Rank: 4th | Margin of Victory Rank: 8th | Penalties Composite Rank: 80th | Yardage Composite Rank: 3rd | Turnover Composite Rank: 47th | 3rd/4th Down Conversion Rank: 25th | Other Stats Rank: 94th |
||
| MemeofMemeJTG999999 | 13 |
(6-2) (down 11) L: 18-30 @ #28 USC (7-2) Next Week: vs #28 Oregon (5-3) Projected Bowl: ReliaQuest Bowl vs LSU |
(6-2) (down 11) L: 18-30 @ #28 USC (7-2) Next Week: vs #28 Oregon (5-3) Projected Bowl: ReliaQuest Bowl vs LSU |
||
| NyquillusDillwad20 | 13 | |
| Rcfan0902 | 13 | 1353.87 (-9) |
1353.87 (-9) |
||
| royrules22 | 13 | |
| shifty1032231 | 13 | |
| skuhlke | 13 | |
| soonerfreak | 13 | |
| T-Thugs | 13 | Ohio State i think is in big trouble without Sayin. They dont look like the same team without him. If i was just going on who I think would win matchups, I'd probably drop them quite a bit. Resume-wise i think they still look pretty good. Nice wins over Indiana (8-1) and Iowa (6-2). Lost to Texas and USC. |
Ohio State i think is in big trouble without Sayin. They dont look like the same team without him. If i was just going on who I think would win matchups, I'd probably drop them quite a bit. Resume-wise i think they still look pretty good. Nice wins over Indiana (8-1) and Iowa (6-2). Lost to Texas and USC. |
||
| TDenverFan | 13 | |
| Texasagsman | 13 | |
| velociraptorfarmer | 13 | |
| Chris-P-Creme | 14 | |
| CPiGuy2728 | 14 | |
| cvsprinter1 | 14 | 2-loss |
2-loss |
||
| cyberchaox | 14 | |
| DarthYoda2594 | 14 | |
| digdat0 | 14 | 14. Ohio State — Score: 0.191 | Results: 0.939, SOS Rank: #30, Quality: 0.129, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 2, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #20, Def Rk: #22 |
14. Ohio State — Score: 0.191 | Results: 0.939, SOS Rank: #30, Quality: 0.129, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 2, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #20, Def Rk: #22 |
||
| djowen68 | 14 | |
| grtgbln | 14 | |
| Hey_Its_Roomie | 14 | |
| IAmAChemicalEngineer | 14 | |
| ikindalikelemons | 14 | |
| Jerrywelfare | 14 | |
| jmac_21 | 14 | |
| KJdkaslknv | 14 | |
| Muffinnnnnnn | 14 | |
| Pablo49 | 14 | 898 |
898 |
||
| Pyromania1983 | 14 | |
| RollWarTideEagle | 14 | |
| ryseing | 14 | |
| SCsprinter13 | 14 | |
| SearonTrejorek | 14 | 0.77750 |
0.77750 |
||
| sgtshenanigans | 14 | |
| strikersteve60 | 14 | |
| studio_sally | 14 | |
| texas2089 | 14 | |
| titansfan174 | 14 | |
| UNC_Samurai | 14 | |
| Xtremeloco | 14 | |
| 52hoova | 15 | |
| Ch-i-ef | 15 | |
| daredassdude | 15 | |
| douchebagjack | 15 |
Best 3 Wins: Indiana, Iowa, Illinois. 2 Losses: Texas, U.S.C.. Oh no. Oh no. Ohio State is gonna miss the playoff I think. ohio state over iowa on h2h |
Best 3 Wins: Indiana, Iowa, Illinois. 2 Losses: Texas, U.S.C.. Oh no. Oh no. Ohio State is gonna miss the playoff I think. ohio state over iowa on h2h |
||
| Dropbackandpunt | 15 | |
| Jay_Dubbbs | 15 | |
| JBonkies | 15 | |
| RJEP22 | 15 | |
| Ruhrgebietheld | 15 | |
| seaotter2 | 15 | |
| sickmemes48 | 15 | |
| spmartin1993 | 15 | |
| StFuzzySlippers | 15 |
None of these rankings should be too contraversial this week except for this one, considering they just got dominated by USC, and I only have them at #19. I won't mince words—the Buckeyes looked like a shell of themselves. However, I'm gonna give them some grace for being on the road, with a freshman QB in his first start, and in the rain. Also, I'm reticent to shoot USC up too much based on this one game when they have been so inconsistent all year. The rest of the season will tell if this is the start of trends for OSU and USC, or if either team reverts to their old ways. |
None of these rankings should be too contraversial this week except for this one, considering they just got dominated by USC, and I only have them at #19. I won't mince words—the Buckeyes looked like a shell of themselves. However, I'm gonna give them some grace for being on the road, with a freshman QB in his first start, and in the rain. Also, I'm reticent to shoot USC up too much based on this one game when they have been so inconsistent all year. The rest of the season will tell if this is the start of trends for OSU and USC, or if either team reverts to their old ways. |
||
| tdeff19 | 15 | |
| w8w8 | 15 | |
| Xy13 | 15 | |
| _fastball | 16 | |
| A_Rolling_Baneling | 16 | |
| budget_um | 16 | Maybe second-best two losses but lost to USC, which couldn't beat a Wisconsin team Iowa just blanked |
Maybe second-best two losses but lost to USC, which couldn't beat a Wisconsin team Iowa just blanked |
||
| colton_97 | 16 | |
| DarkLegend64 | 16 | |
| Inkblot9 | 16 | |
| justsaynotoreddit | 16 | |
| manbeardawg | 16 | |
| Noy_Telinu | 16 | And that means tOSU goes... somewhere? It has to be below those 2 at LEAST but above Iowa since they beat Iowa. |
And that means tOSU goes... somewhere? It has to be below those 2 at LEAST but above Iowa since they beat Iowa. |
||
| one98d | 16 | |
| Pure_Protein_Machine | 16 | |
| ShogunAshoka | 16 | |
| srs_house | 16 | |
| Staind075 | 16 | |
| ToeInDigDeep | 16 | Loss at Texas, at USC |
Loss at Texas, at USC |
||
| chillmagic420 | 17 | |
| GeauxTri | 17 | 6-2. Elite road win at Indiana plus Iowa; loss at USC joins the one-point loss at Texas. |
6-2. Elite road win at Indiana plus Iowa; loss at USC joins the one-point loss at Texas. |
||
| NotSoSuperNerd | 17 | 1.747 [9.24-2.76] |
1.747 [9.24-2.76] |
||
| owlalwaysloveyew | 17 | |
| plannedsickdays | 17 | |
| Rakarei | 17 | |
| RedBarracuda25 | 17 | |
| grjohnst | 18 | |
| JustAManAndHisLaptop | 18 | |
| RiffRamBahZoo | 18 | |
| RobertNeyland | 18 | |
| tks231 | 18 | |
| vanburen1845 | 18 | |
| ch1l1_ch33s3 | 19 | |
| ColombianInIowa24 | 19 | 35.03 - [6-2] Imagine losing to USC, lol. Seems a bit harsh of a drop for me, but okay. Up next Oregon. (Mode: Rank 22) |
35.03 - [6-2] Imagine losing to USC, lol. Seems a bit harsh of a drop for me, but okay. Up next Oregon. (Mode: Rank 22) |
||
| corundum9 | 19 | |
| LiptonCB | 19 | |
| spsellers | 19 | |
| TheNSAAgent777 | 19 | |
| MADBuc49 | 20 | -18 |
-18 |
||
| G-Aardvark | 21 | |
| infinitempg | 21 | 0.751, -13 |
0.751, -13 |
||
| spasm01 | 21 | |
| TaylorLeprechaun | 21 | -19 |
-19 |
||
| sirvalkyerie | 22 | |
| aggiebruin27 | 25 | |
| User | Rank | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| HokiPoqi | 3 | |
| Nath0leon | 3 | -2. |
-2. |
||
| drewscottt | 4 | -1 |
-1 |
||
| Impossible-Still-349 | 4 | (-2) |
(-2) |
||
| mathwrath55 | 4 | |
| CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY | 5 | 6-2; blend +1.88; resume #7, power #6, SOR #7 |
6-2; blend +1.88; resume #7, power #6, SOR #7 |
||
| chief_sitass | 5 | |
| dee3Poh | 6 | .770 |
.770 |
||
| owl-bears | 6 | |
| Piptit | 6 | |
| saquad69 | 6 | |
| ThompsonCreekTiger | 6 | |
| 1Subject | 7 | |
| 2AcesRoth | 7 |
net elo off def ridge fei conf +19.9 +19.4 33.6 14.2 +25.7 +14.7 Big Ten |
net elo off def ridge fei conf +19.9 +19.4 33.6 14.2 +25.7 +14.7 Big Ten |
||
| 666PeaceKeepaGirl | 7 | |
| penix4heisman | 7 | |
| Pyroblockx | 7 | |
| sportstrap | 7 | |
| TyRoland06 | 7 | |
| fm22fnam | 8 | |
| jackmc04 | 8 | (-6) |
(-6) |
||
| KevinDoesSports | 8 | |
| logace444444444 | 8 | |
| manbeqrpig | 8 | |
| Pure-Shirt-5831 | 8 | |
| shouldajustsaid_yeah | 8 | |
| spaceblev11 | 8 | |
| Arago_ | 9 | |
| BigGamesShouldCount | 9 | |
| buccaneerboy22 | 9 | |
| EL-YEO | 9 | |
| FrontRunner51 | 9 | |
| grahamca | 9 | T19ᵗʰ W/L, T7ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 5ᵗʰ Team Strength, 6ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
T19ᵗʰ W/L, T7ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 5ᵗʰ Team Strength, 6ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
||
| Milflover69cbb | 9 | |
| newSomberMan | 9 | |
| SpectralHydra | 9 | |
| Aggravating-Funny569 | 10 | Rough showing against USC. The only reason they aren’t lower is because I want to keep them above Indiana |
Rough showing against USC. The only reason they aren’t lower is because I want to keep them above Indiana |
||
| ArlyntheAwesome | 10 | this feels like an extreme drop but I HATE USC this year, they've looked dookie poopie butt ass more weeks than not, embarrassing but somewhat expected loss |
this feels like an extreme drop but I HATE USC this year, they've looked dookie poopie butt ass more weeks than not, embarrassing but somewhat expected loss |
||
| bruhstevenson | 10 | |
| cartgold | 10 | |
| GenuineBoss | 10 | |
| hbh110 | 10 | |
| HHunko13 | 10 | |
| Midnight-Mustang | 10 | |
| NebraskaPlainsman | 10 | |
| Noahsince2002 | 10 | |
| NoOutdoorSoup | 10 | |
| pongislame | 10 | |
| Select-Edge-3262 | 10 | -8 |
-8 |
||
| Sflabuckeye13 | 10 | |
| TheSecondCrypt | 10 | |
| undercover_hot_dog | 10 | |
| Akapacman415 | 11 | |
| Blazemaster77 | 11 | |
| Effective-Lead-6657 | 11 | |
| josh55134 | 11 | |
| kevinsdomain | 11 | |
| Kirkwood641 | 11 | |
| loneSTAR_06 | 11 | |
| MillerHighLifeStan | 11 | |
| ninjatown23 | 11 | After their bye week, OSU came out flat. They got whooped on the road at USC with backup Fahey running the offense. OSU is trending in the wrong direction and moves just outside the top 10 at #11. |
After their bye week, OSU came out flat. They got whooped on the road at USC with backup Fahey running the offense. OSU is trending in the wrong direction and moves just outside the top 10 at #11. |
||
| Ok_Boysenberry716 | 11 | |
| quantum_jedi | 11 | |
| samtaylor92 | 11 | |
| SonOfGarry | 11 | |
| ted1995 | 11 | |
| TheBeekman8 | 11 | |
| WBLwiffleball | 11 | |
| 70277027 | 12 | |
| _THE__BOULDER_ | 12 | I know Sayin is out but God damn. This normally astounding defense was carved up and OSU was never in the game. I mean, a screen pass that went 69 yards on the 2nd play of the game is just crazy work. |
I know Sayin is out but God damn. This normally astounding defense was carved up and OSU was never in the game. I mean, a screen pass that went 69 yards on the 2nd play of the game is just crazy work. |
||
| bigred91224 | 12 | |
| DillyDillySzn | 12 | |
| Equal_Resort4348 | 12 | They lose this game even with sayin. Idk how to trust them when they have a backup qb, high school o-line, and shit defense. |
They lose this game even with sayin. Idk how to trust them when they have a backup qb, high school o-line, and shit defense. |
||
| FickleWolverine | 12 | Losing to this USC team is bad, even if Luke Fahey is QB... |
Losing to this USC team is bad, even if Luke Fahey is QB... |
||
| JJones927 | 12 | |
| LightningDusty | 12 | ↓10 |
↓10 |
||
| meristematic | 12 | |
| MyAngelMiraidon | 12 | -8 - USC. really. I spend weeks basically dumping on USC for not beating anyone good and this happens |
-8 - USC. really. I spend weeks basically dumping on USC for not beating anyone good and this happens |
||
| ResearchFlaky5912 | 12 | I think that Ohio's slide should stop here. Indiana is this team's only truly good win, preventing them from being any higher. Makes sense they would find themselves right behind the team they barely lost to earlier in the season. |
I think that Ohio's slide should stop here. Indiana is this team's only truly good win, preventing them from being any higher. Makes sense they would find themselves right behind the team they barely lost to earlier in the season. |
||
| SignificanceFirm2398 | 12 | |
| tbraptors | 12 | |
| The_Stratman | 12 | |
| BasicUsername5362 | 13 | |
| Character_Orchid4698 | 13 | |
| Flaky_Bit6733 | 13 | |
| geordieColt88 | 13 | |
| GreenAndYellow12 | 13 | 0.432 |-11| |
0.432 |-11| |
||
| isrealball | 13 | |
| leadbymight | 13 | |
| Lucaball3r | 13 | |
| NC_Pineapple | 13 | |
| Ok_Significance_3803 | 13 | |
| Quick-Newt-5651 | 13 | |
| S2OP | 13 | (-11) |
(-11) |
||
| Scottyfer | 13 | |
| SportsCat4 | 13 | |
| Star_Wars_Sith | 13 | |
| TailgateLegend | 13 | |
| AoA_nB1 | 14 | Way too far of a drop, but I don't know if the Buckeyes can win out from here. Yesterdays loss isn’t totally on Fahey, but the Buckeyes had a death of a thousand papercuts |
Way too far of a drop, but I don't know if the Buckeyes can win out from here. Yesterdays loss isn’t totally on Fahey, but the Buckeyes had a death of a thousand papercuts |
||
| d1sportsball | 14 | Behind USC because of H2H, opportunity to move up the rankings with their schedule |
Behind USC because of H2H, opportunity to move up the rankings with their schedule |
||
| Delicious_Fig5384 | 14 | |
| dende-wav | 14 | Get em outta here |
Get em outta here |
||
| FoodCourtDruid | 14 | |
| gohncell | 14 | |
| HereComesNightTime | 14 | |
| ianmcmoney | 14 | 56.76% |
56.76% |
||
| JCNoles | 14 | 15/9 |
15/9 |
||
| jtchr33 | 14 | Interesting team to look at for the near and far future. Have they already fallen, will it continue, will they get a better QB2 or coaching for them in the future. Seem to just be at a tricky crossroad. |
Interesting team to look at for the near and far future. Have they already fallen, will it continue, will they get a better QB2 or coaching for them in the future. Seem to just be at a tricky crossroad. |
||
| kennethbring | 14 | |
| ogsmurf826 | 14 | |
| Rhizical | 14 | |
| Rishik01 | 14 | |
| rob_bot13 | 14 | 1744 points: Woof. |
1744 points: Woof. |
||
| rt13wx | 14 | |
| thatoneguyD13 | 14 | Tier 4. Hard to rank with backup QB and defensive struggles. |
Tier 4. Hard to rank with backup QB and defensive struggles. |
||
| BoNnnnfhir | 15 | |
| DarthGlazer | 15 | I guess just throwing it up to jeremiah smith is that difficult? if raiola balls out and northwester isn't scared it's going to be an interesting 'The Game' in a few weeks.... just 3 years ago both teams were undefeated going in, and this year they might both be 7-4 lol. |
I guess just throwing it up to jeremiah smith is that difficult? if raiola balls out and northwester isn't scared it's going to be an interesting 'The Game' in a few weeks.... just 3 years ago both teams were undefeated going in, and this year they might both be 7-4 lol. |
||
| dstrainr | 15 | |
| PsychologicalFox8660 | 15 | |
| Real-Plant-5722 | 15 | |
| RowDull8230 | 15 | |
| Tortillero96 | 15 |
-14 L (6-2) A -12 vs USC (16) W (6-1) A +4 vs Indiana (2) W (5-1) H +29 vs Maryland (unranked) W (4-1) A +17 vs Iowa (14) W (3-1) H +23 vs Illinois (unranked) W (2-1) H +56 vs Kent State (unranked) L (1-1) A -1 vs Texas (6) W (1-0) H +53 vs Ball State (unranked) |
-14 L (6-2) A -12 vs USC (16) W (6-1) A +4 vs Indiana (2) W (5-1) H +29 vs Maryland (unranked) W (4-1) A +17 vs Iowa (14) W (3-1) H +23 vs Illinois (unranked) W (2-1) H +56 vs Kent State (unranked) L (1-1) A -1 vs Texas (6) W (1-0) H +53 vs Ball State (unranked) |
||
| Antopher64 | 16 | -1.057 |
-1.057 |
||
| Applesaucemannus | 16 | |
| beckett929 | 16 | |
| BlueRFR3100 | 16 | |
| divey043 | 16 | |
| jwrtf | 16 | |
| myworld3 | 16 | |
| Oldenmw | 16 | |
| Yelich04 | 16 | v14 |
v14 |
||
| g_trechel | 17 | |
| gonshpreds1 | 17 | |
| GrimmacingGrinny | 17 | |
| Spazzatack | 17 | |
| DownshiftGD | 18 | |
| JackWK_Gaming | 18 | |
| jibberishdhyukl | 18 | |
| m3owzika | 18 | |
| NA_Faker | 18 | |
| thehornedlamb | 18 | |
| bocnj | 19 | |
| LegionMammal978 | 19 | (−5) GS .871, TS 2759: 56.7% #18 Indiana + 39.6% #22 Iowa + 3.6% #46 Illinois = 82.8% #29 USC + 17.2% #8 Texas. |
(−5) GS .871, TS 2759: 56.7% #18 Indiana + 39.6% #22 Iowa + 3.6% #46 Illinois = 82.8% #29 USC + 17.2% #8 Texas. |
||
| Tch267702 | 19 | |
| CallMeTheKing | 20 | 111-26-0 |
111-26-0 |
||
| jmdinbtr | 20 | |
| KingYeetusV | 20 | Lost to USC, by a lot more than one would expect from Ohio State. Has statement wins against Iowa and Indiana. Looks like an entirely different team without Sayin, and that's not a good different. |
Lost to USC, by a lot more than one would expect from Ohio State. Has statement wins against Iowa and Indiana. Looks like an entirely different team without Sayin, and that's not a good different. |
||
| Nervous_Metal_9445 | 21 | USC > Ohio State |
USC > Ohio State |
||
| bryophyta_insolitam | 24 | |