Oklahoma Sooners
Rankings
| User | Rank | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| ExternalTangents | 14 | Overall +17.0; offense +3.2 (53rd), defense -13.9 (6th) |
| JeromesNiece | 14 | |
| Conglossian | 15 | U/R |
| NotSoSuperNerd | 15 | 1.679 [6.72-5.28] |
| Fmeson | 18 | |
| Stoneador | 18 | 90 | 5 | 27 |
| TheZachster | 18 | |
| visor841 | 19 | |
| Chipsahoy523 | 20 | +5 |
| jbowen1 | 20 | |
| DampFrijoles | 21 | |
| 52hoova | 22 | |
| Bereft13 | 22 | Power: 19, SoR: 27; LW: NR (31) |
| CRedds19 | 22 | |
| PlactusTX | 22 | LW: NR | Tier 3 | W Texas |
| RobertNeyland | 22 | |
| sirgippy | 22 | GippyRank expected rank: 17.8. Central 80% interval: 6–33. Top-25 probability: 80%. |
| Blazeth | 23 | |
| COLU_BUS | 23 | |
| noahthearc | 23 | |
| owlalwaysloveyew | 23 | |
| ruwisc | 23 | |
| smartkeg | 23 | A shaky 2-loss team that has a great win vs Texas. |
| ChBass | 24 | That's how you negate a loss to Michigan. The 72nd best offense in cfb leaned on a top-10 defense and scored just enough to get the win, which is just enough to get ranked. |
| CptCheese | 24 | |
| Player_1_has_Joined | 24 | |
| 0010MK | 25 | |
| CPiGuy2728 | 25 | |
| douchebagjack | 25 | Best 3 Wins: Texas, New Mexico, U.T.E.P.. 2 Losses: Michigan, Georgia. Texas win in the RRS. That's a banger of a win. Keeps them in contention I guess. Worse for Texas than good for Oklahoma long term I think. Throwing them in here as a lol, assume they won't be back. |
| GeauxTri | 25 | Elite win over Texas offsets losses to Michigan and Georgia against a very difficult schedule. |
| hypercube42342 | 25 | Power 15 / Resume 37 |
| jmac_21 | 25 | |
| justsaynotoreddit | 25 | |
| laprasrules | 25 | |
| luckroy | 25 | |
| PattyKane16 | 25 | |
| soonerfreak | 25 | |
| SwissArmyScythe | 25 | NR (Dropped: 13 Florida, 16 LSU, 22 Duke) |
| User | Rank | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY | 16 | |
| CallMeTheKing | 17 | 101-11-25 |
| meristematic | 17 | |
| 666PeaceKeepaGirl | 18 | |
| GDSamstag | 18 | |
| ianmcmoney | 18 | 78.71% |
| LegionMammal978 | 19 | [T17.] (+20) GS .875, TS −225: 100% #17 Texas = 100% #17 Michigan + 0% #1 Georgia. |
| Effective-Lead-6657 | 20 | (NR) They beat Texas, and I'm biased. Enough said. |
| manbeqrpig | 20 | |
| Piptit | 20 | |
| ted1995 | 20 | |
| dee3Poh | 21 | .190 |
| HokiPoqi | 21 | |
| Impossible-Still-349 | 21 | (NEW!) cotton bowl stadium |
| IWieldTheFlameOfAnor | 21 | 197 |
| 70277027 | 22 | |
| kennethbring | 22 | |
| NoOutdoorSoup | 22 | |
| jis024 | 23 | |
| Menktenk | 23 | |
| chief_sitass | 24 | |
| mathwrath55 | 24 | Beating the team that the model had as its combined #1 is enough to get a 2-loss team to jump in (even if they are still behind two other 2-loss teams). In fact @Michigan and Oregon@OKST are now pretty similar losses from the model's perspective |
| quantum_jedi | 24 | (45.01, +15) Rewarded for an absolutely head-scratching win over Texas, but that's Red River for yah. Great job by the Sooners to take advantage of some baffling Texas mistakes. |
| samtaylor92 | 24 | |
| 2AcesRoth | 25 | net elo off def ridge fei conf +10.7 +9.6 27.8 18.2 +16.1 +6.4 SEC |
| d1sportsball | 25 | Oklahoma had a huge win over Texas... but thats about it. They nearly lost to UNM, and did lose to a 3 loss Michigan and get demolished by UGA. They are looking better than Tennessee though, so yes, even in the SEC a 2 loss team can be better than a 1 loss team. |
| hbh110 | 25 | |
| newSomberMan | 25 | Dropped: #19 Florida, #21 LSU, #23 Pittsburgh Considered: New Mexico, Arizona, Wake Forest, USC |
| PrideSax711 | 25 | |
| rt13wx | 25 | |
| SignificanceFirm2398 | 25 | |
| TheCryptPartDeux | 25 |