Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2026, 9:42 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Elo using Wins/Losses with metric for strength of schedule (Average opponent rating) and team efficiency (success rate)
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
|
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
|
| 3 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
|
| 4 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
|
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
|
| 6 |
BYU Cougars
|
|
| 7 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
|
| 8 |
Utah Utes
|
|
| 9 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
|
| 10 |
James Madison Dukes
|
|
| 11 |
Texas Longhorns
|
|
| 12 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
|
| 13 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
|
| 14 |
Oregon Ducks
|
|
| 15 |
LSU Tigers
|
|
| 16 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
|
| 17 |
USC Trojans
|
|
| 18 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
|
| 19 |
SMU Mustangs
|
|
| 20 |
Missouri Tigers
|
|
| 21 |
Boise State Broncos
|
|
| 22 |
Kentucky Wildcats
|
|
| 23 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
|
| 24 |
Houston Cougars
|
|
| 25 |
UTSA Roadrunners
|
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
1.27 |
| 2 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.04 |
| 3 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
0.09 |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.01 |
| 6 |
BYU Cougars
|
-0.88 |
| 7 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
| 9 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
-0.22 |
| 10 |
James Madison Dukes
|
1.12 |
| 11 |
Texas Longhorns
|
1.32 |
| 12 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.00 |
| 13 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
0.00 |
| 14 |
Oregon Ducks
|
2.18 |
| 15 |
LSU Tigers
|
0.25 |
| 16 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
0.00 |
| 17 |
USC Trojans
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
0.20 |
| 19 |
SMU Mustangs
|
0.43 |
| 20 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.78 |
| 21 |
Boise State Broncos
|
0.00 |
| 22 |
Kentucky Wildcats
|
-1.30 |
| 23 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
2.21 |
| 24 |
Houston Cougars
|
-2.19 |
| 25 |
UTSA Roadrunners
|
0.00 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
UCLA Bruins
|
4.25 |
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
|
1.75 |
Northwestern Wildcats
|
0.80 |
Florida Gators
|
0.42 |
Total Score: 21.70