Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
Overall Rationale: 4 Rankings combined: W/L Record, Predicted Wins, Team Strength, Quality of Wins. Full(er) rationale at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1II5aTpECPM6S94RfX8bTlAhNFVAeXKto_bF1YI7wi9U
The computer doesn't have any direct head-to-head rationale for rankings, so Indiana is still over Ohio State since OSU is a more quality loss
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T1ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 2ⁿᵈ Team Strength, 6ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 2 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 1ˢᵗ Team Strength, 5ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 3 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 4ᵗʰ Team Strength, 4ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 4 |
Houston Cougars
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 7ᵗʰ Team Strength, 8ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 11ᵗʰ Team Strength, 7ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 6 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T1ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 12ᵗʰ Team Strength, 19ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 7 |
UCLA Bruins
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T1ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 18ᵗʰ Team Strength, 16ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 8 |
Utah Utes
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 9ᵗʰ Team Strength, 15ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T1ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 6ᵗʰ Team Strength, 33ʳᵈ Quality of Wins |
| 10 |
LSU Tigers
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 3ʳᵈ Team Strength, 1ˢᵗ Quality of Wins |
| 11 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 15ᵗʰ Team Strength, 10ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 12 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 5ᵗʰ Team Strength, 3ʳᵈ Quality of Wins |
| 13 |
Kentucky Wildcats
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 25ᵗʰ Team Strength, 17ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 14 |
James Madison Dukes
|
T1ˢᵗ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 27ᵗʰ Team Strength, 29ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 15 |
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T5ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 29ᵗʰ Team Strength, 26ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 16 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
T18ᵗʰ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 10ᵗʰ Team Strength, 36ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 17 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 14ᵗʰ Team Strength, 2ⁿᵈ Quality of Wins |
| 18 |
Nebraska Cornhuskers
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 8ᵗʰ Team Strength, 14ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 19 |
North Dakota State Bison
|
T7ᵗʰ W/L, T11ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 22ⁿᵈ Team Strength, 42ⁿᵈ Quality of Wins |
| 20 |
Northwestern Wildcats
|
T18ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 13ᵗʰ Team Strength, 21ˢᵗ Quality of Wins |
| 21 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
T18ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 28ᵗʰ Team Strength, 12ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 22 |
Texas Longhorns
|
T42ⁿᵈ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 19ᵗʰ Team Strength, 11ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 23 |
Missouri Tigers
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T48ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 26ᵗʰ Team Strength, 9ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 24 |
Oregon State Beavers
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 38ᵗʰ Team Strength, 20ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
| 25 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
T27ᵗʰ W/L, T18ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 30ᵗʰ Team Strength, 28ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 2 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.96 |
| 3 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Houston Cougars
|
2.06 |
| 5 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.01 |
| 6 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
UCLA Bruins
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
| 9 |
BYU Cougars
|
-2.20 |
| 10 |
LSU Tigers
|
1.30 |
| 11 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
-0.66 |
| 13 |
Kentucky Wildcats
|
0.00 |
| 14 |
James Madison Dukes
|
0.44 |
| 15 |
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
0.00 |
| 17 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Nebraska Cornhuskers
|
6.24 |
| 19 |
North Dakota State Bison
|
5.79 |
| 20 |
Northwestern Wildcats
|
0.00 |
| 21 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
-2.07 |
| 22 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.00 |
| 23 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 24 |
Oregon State Beavers
|
0.77 |
| 25 |
Pittsburgh Panthers
|
0.21 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
USC Trojans
|
1.46 |
Boise State Broncos
|
0.48 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
0.35 |
Florida Gators
|
0.42 |
SMU Mustangs
|
0.28 |
Total Score: 25.71