Wisconsin Badgers
Rankings
| User | Rank | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| ColombianInIowa24 | 12 | 32.21 - [6-3] Dominance over nobody. Why did they climb up? Only losses are to #2 UCLA, #4 Notre Dame and a solid Iowa team. SOS boost helps them. Up next, more nobody. (Mode: 26, Median: 28) |
32.21 - [6-3] Dominance over nobody. Why did they climb up? Only losses are to #2 UCLA, #4 Notre Dame and a solid Iowa team. SOS boost helps them. Up next, more nobody. (Mode: 26, Median: 28) |
||
| Hugefootballfan44 | 19 | |
| dabul-master | 20 | |
| galacticdude7 | 20 |
Predicted Record: 9-3 Losses: Notre Dame (13-41), @UCLA (7-17), @Iowa (0-30) |
Predicted Record: 9-3 Losses: Notre Dame (13-41), @UCLA (7-17), @Iowa (0-30) |
||
| Jakesnake42 | 20 | Wisconsin has looked uncompetitive in all 3 losses which isn't great but hey you beat USC and didn't lose to anyone bad! Last Week: NR |
Wisconsin has looked uncompetitive in all 3 losses which isn't great but hey you beat USC and didn't lose to anyone bad! Last Week: NR |
||
| budget_um | 21 | |
| dschinghiskhan | 22 | |
| shifty1032231 | 22 | |
| ChBass | 23 | Okay, the model loves Wisconsin. How are the three-loss Badgers not relegated to the scrap heap of the season? Check out the power ratings of their losses: Notre Dame (1), UCLA (7), and Iowa (24). They also have a top-10 defense and a power rating of 21 themselves. |
Okay, the model loves Wisconsin. How are the three-loss Badgers not relegated to the scrap heap of the season? Check out the power ratings of their losses: Notre Dame (1), UCLA (7), and Iowa (24). They also have a top-10 defense and a power rating of 21 themselves. |
||
| daredassdude | 23 | |
| ExternalTangents | 23 | 91.2% |
91.2% |
||
| GeauxTri | 23 | 6-3. Owns a major win over USC and has faced a difficult schedule. Three losses cap the resume. |
6-3. Owns a major win over USC and has faced a difficult schedule. Three losses cap the resume. |
||
| luckroy | 23 | |
| sirvalkyerie | 23 | |
| SwissArmyScythe | 23 | -1 |
-1 |
||
| HieloLuz | 24 | |
| noahthearc | 24 | |
| redwave2505 | 24 | |
| Stoneador | 24 | 4 | 16 | 46 |
4 | 16 | 46 |
||
| visor841 | 24 | |
| AlphaH4wk | 25 | |
| bladefencer | 25 | 0.792, +3, Pow: 30, Off: 69, Def: 10, SOR: 27 |
0.792, +3, Pow: 30, Off: 69, Def: 10, SOR: 27 |
||
| Cars-and-Coffee | 25 | |
| COLU_BUS | 25 | |
| cyberchaox | 25 | Next five: Oklahoma State, Duke, Missouri, LSU, North Texas |
Next five: Oklahoma State, Duke, Missouri, LSU, North Texas |
||
| ehoefler | 25 | 73.78 | NEW +6 |
73.78 | NEW +6 |
||
| fredmerc111 | 25 | |
| Rakarei | 25 | |
| SIMBONEGTP | 25 | |
| User | Rank | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| logace444444444 | 17 | |
| RealityComps | 19 | |
| GDSamstag | 21 | |
| ted1995 | 21 | |
| g_trechel | 22 | |
| jwrtf | 22 | |
| 1Subject | 23 | |
| jibberishdhyukl | 23 | |
| manbeqrpig | 23 | |
| bocnj | 24 | |
| chief_sitass | 24 | |
| DarthGlazer | 24 | |
| Forsaken_Forever_678 | 24 | |
| FrontRunner51 | 24 | (not ranked) |
(not ranked) |
||
| gohncell | 24 | |
| mathwrath55 | 24 | |
| NoOutdoorSoup | 24 | |
| ResearchFlaky5912 | 24 | USC and Iowa's rise makes their record look a little better. Not much else to say. 3 losses just is not prohibitive of re-entry at this point. Better resume than Illinois or Missouri when considered overall. |
USC and Iowa's rise makes their record look a little better. Not much else to say. 3 losses just is not prohibitive of re-entry at this point. Better resume than Illinois or Missouri when considered overall. |
||
| Arago_ | 25 | |
| Flaky_Bit6733 | 25 | |
| JJones927 | 25 | |
| josh55134 | 25 | |
| Nervous_Metal_9445 | 25 | |
| tbraptors | 25 | Despite Wisconsin getting smoked by Iowa recently, they actually have a fairly decent resume, with their other two losses being against top 10 teams, and a solid top 25 win against USC |
Despite Wisconsin getting smoked by Iowa recently, they actually have a fairly decent resume, with their other two losses being against top 10 teams, and a solid top 25 win against USC |
||