Best 3 Wins: Alabama, Kentucky, Auburn.
2 Losses: Texas, South Carolina.
That was an ass kicking. They stay above Alabama, but below Texas. The resume is really good at the moments

2.079 [8.96-3.04]

153

When you've got 3 similar resumes and one of them is 1-1 against the other two...

Tennessee smoked a solid Kentucky team at home add in their win against Bama and you have a solid playoff resume. Tennessee's defense is elite but will need better QB play to go far in the playoffs.

Tennessee demolished UK and gets to move up as reward as part of this SEC H2H Sandwich. Last Week: #13

(7-2) (up 8)
W: 34-6 vs #5 Kentucky (7-1)
Next Week: @ Texas A&M (4-5)
Projected Bowl: Playoff R1 vs Texas Tech

Power: 10, SoR: 10; LW: 16

+7

+4

+3

"Why aren't they ahead of Alabama" - Resume isn't equal. Tennessee plays A&M and LSU, both top 30 teams Alabama has played already. I think we'll see a flip due to pod structuring either next week or the week after. Right now it's 2-2 top 30 versus 4-2 for Alabama.

Could make a case for higher, just felt like more 1 loss teams deserved it. Need one more signature win, which they still have on the schedule in LSU. Would expect them to win out and coast into the playoff, so they can work their way up on attrition.

+0. Would be the #10 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #7 Miami in the first round

The Vols defeated Kentucky in a solid all-around performance. When they are playing well, they were are perhaps the best team in the country but their consistency leaves questions for a playoff run.

Up 4 - wins over #12 and #16, losses to #9 and #15

[7-2, 4-2 SEC] (+8) | SOR: #12 | Notable Results: L 17-20 vs #9 Texas [7-2], W 24-17 @ Arkansas [3-6], W 26-10 vs #11 Alabama [7-2], L 24-27 @ #25 South Carolina [6-3], W 34-6 vs #14 Kentucky [7-2] |

(+11)

75.1%

They've looked dominant at home and timid on the road. Every good team benefits from home field advantage to an extent, but you don't want it to be your biggest advantage.

+13

83.96 | +7

0.76734

Loss to Texas, South Carolina

Why does the CFB have them below bama?

LW: 18. Best win: #9 Alabama. Worst loss: UR South Carolina

4 | 18 | 109

Score 71.41 (▲ 4.05) | Place Change: ▲ 6 | Previous Rank: 24th | Wins Composite Rank: 18th | SoS Composite Rank: 21st | Margin of Victory Rank: 15th | Penalties Composite Rank: 101st | Yardage Composite Rank: 34th | Turnover Composite Rank: 27th | 3rd/4th Down Conversion Rank: 47th | Other Stats Rank: 19th

1312.62 (+8)

0.762, +12

(+6) GS .846, TS 2900: 45.9% #4 Alabama + 39.1% #6 Kentucky + 13.0% #17 Auburn + 1.9% #35 Arkansas + 0.1% #78 Georgia Tech = 52.5% #8 South Carolina + 47.5% #7 Texas.

+5
W (7-2) H +28 vs Kentucky (6)
L (6-2) A -3 vs South Carolina (unranked)
W (6-1) H +16 vs Alabama (7)
W (5-1) A +7 vs Arkansas (unranked)
W (4-1) H +10 vs Auburn (unranked)
L (3-1) H -3 vs Texas (1)
W (3-0) H +33 vs Kennesaw St. (unranked)
W (2-0) A +21 vs Georgia Tech (unranked)
W (1-0) H +47 vs Furman (unranked)

^5 (#1 2-loss team, better than Alabama (#2 2-loss team) because they beat them h2h, better than Wake Forest (#4 1-loss team) because their best wins are far better than Wake Forest's.)

Bama win will get them pretty high this season but cannot play every game at home :)

.650

Beating #14 Kentucky in similar fashion to how Alabama did, while having a win over #9 Alabama, causes them to leap upwards in my rankings. Losses to #11 Texas and #21 SCAR are not as bad as they were earlier in the season. I don't see any reason to keep them behind Bama at this point.

7-2; score +1.44 = blend +1.51 -0.08 results; Q1/Q2 wins 1/1; losses Q1,Q1; ahead of Kentucky on head-to-head

(+10)

(17)

↑3

(+6)

(+5)

800