User |
Rank |
Reason |
TadKosciuszko
|
6 |
|
owl-bears
|
9 |
|
cirtnecoileh
|
11 |
|
SleepsWithBlindsOpen
|
11 |
|
tomdawg0022
|
11 |
|
swdanley17
|
12 |
|
boblovespi
|
13 |
|
Devintheroaster
|
13 |
739.16 Points |
JetoGrov
|
13 |
On one hand, the Notre Dame win looks better. On the other, how can a team that lost to Pitt be ranked this high? Probably the ranking I feel the worst about this week. But L'Ville has to be ranked above Duke (cause ND)...and I DO think that Duke should be this high. |
sconbon
|
13 |
|
ndbfsu22
|
14 |
|
nebsA1
|
14 |
|
ehoefler
|
15 |
81.93 | -10 |
Jacob_Sumner
|
15 |
|
mithrandir2398
|
15 |
|
PlactusTX
|
15 |
(5) L Pittsburgh |
thatoneguyD13
|
15 |
Bad loss, but win over ND keeps them above the Irish. |
ard8
|
16 |
|
daredassdude
|
16 |
|
Dawg-Bite
|
16 |
Louisville likely should have dropped more, but their head 2 head win over Notre Dame provides a safety net |
JBonkies
|
16 |
|
Le_Jerk_My_Circle
|
16 |
|
samuelbassett
|
16 |
Good team, but not among the elite. Definitely a drop off between the top 15 and the next 15. |
silfarion10
|
16 |
|
youngs2309
|
16 |
|
boomersooner222
|
17 |
|
cfbpeoplespoll
|
17 |
|
ChBass
|
17 |
|
Dan20698
|
17 |
|
DillyDillySzn
|
17 |
|
gavinw24
|
17 |
|
Jay_Dubbbs
|
17 |
|
Protoco2
|
17 |
|
SpeddyDawg
|
17 |
|
SpursUpSoundsGudToMe
|
17 |
|
TheFalconGuy
|
17 |
|
thehornedlamb
|
17 |
|
TheRedKing75
|
17 |
|
TheSleaze22
|
17 |
|
birdh0useinyours0ul
|
18 |
|
boondocknim
|
18 |
|
bthombeast
|
18 |
|
cookie__monster___
|
18 |
|
Effective-Lead-6657
|
18 |
|
journey1986
|
18 |
|
mthompson2320
|
18 |
LW: 14 |
RJEP22
|
18 |
(6-1) - 107.655pts |
Serenityy8
|
18 |
|
Shion314
|
18 |
|
Tornadohunter24
|
18 |
(-7) [6-1] Credentials:
2022 ACC Atlantic Joint 3rd Place, Final Record: 8-5 ||
2023 Results So Far: 39-34 @ Georgia Tech [3-3], 56-0 vs Murray State [FCS, 2-4], 21-14 @ Indiana [2-5], 56-28 vs Boston College [3-3], 13-10 @ NC State [4-3], 33-20 vs Notre Dame [6-2], 21-38 @ Pitt [2-4] |
BenchRickyAguayo
|
19 |
High: 17 Low: 22 Avg.: 18.5 |
camus69x
|
19 |
|
Esb5415
|
19 |
Pitt? Really? |
Foriegn_Picachu
|
19 |
|
frone
|
19 |
|
grtgbln
|
19 |
|
Jadenflo
|
19 |
|
jakepadres23
|
19 |
|
JHallquist
|
19 |
|
MajikSix
|
19 |
|
mauliknshah
|
19 |
|
Milflover69cbb
|
19 |
|
Morrgs
|
19 |
|
sly2bfox
|
19 |
|
soonertiger
|
19 |
|
spmartin1993
|
19 |
|
squibby
|
19 |
|
StannisGrammarMannis
|
19 |
|
throwaway_6786
|
19 |
Wow, that was rough. Losing by 17 to a 2-4 Pitt team is really bad no matter how you slice it, though the ND win looks better. Louisville will have to get back on their horse quick to get back up towards the top 10 with Duke coming to town. |
tisofold
|
19 |
The highs and the lows of college football. Weak SOS except for Notre Dame, who they crushed. But a loss to Pitt really hurts. |
funt9rtle
|
20 |
|
geauxsaints777
|
20 |
|
Harpua99
|
20 |
|
iHasMagyk
|
20 |
|
jaybigs
|
20 |
9574 |
JustinMSU21
|
20 |
|
losbullitt
|
20 |
|
ManiacalBlazer
|
20 |
76.091 |
MemeofMemeJTG999999
|
20 |
(6-1) (down 7)
L: 21-38 @ Pittsburgh (2-4)
Next Week: Bye
Projected Bowl: Holiday |
PythonLemon
|
20 |
|
samtaylor92
|
20 |
|
SharkMovies
|
20 |
|
SNjr
|
20 |
|
soneill06
|
20 |
|
SortaDecent
|
20 |
|
WBLwiffleball
|
20 |
|
WRSpill
|
20 |
(15) |
zenverak
|
20 |
|
AnAngryPanda1
|
21 |
|
Bereft13
|
21 |
Power: 23, SoR: 19; LW: 11 |
big_thunder_man
|
21 |
Lost to a 2-4 Pitt by 14. Ugh. |
CallingUagoatUgoat
|
21 |
1 SP+ T-10 win (Notre Dame). 1 SP+ T-50 loss (Pittsburgh). Louisville tumbled 15 spots after their loss to a not-so-great Pitt team. |
corona779
|
21 |
|
dawgfan24348
|
21 |
|
divey043
|
21 |
|
dubkent
|
21 |
|
ETHTrillionaire
|
21 |
|
FlashSpider-man
|
21 |
Awful, awful loss. They threw away any momentum from the ND win. On one hand, great win there. On the other hand, losing by multiple possessions to this year's Pitt team and only beating this year's IU by one score is not good. They are still a one loss team, but I don't think they deserve top 20. |
Got_That_WeeFee
|
21 |
|
HideNZeke
|
21 |
|
josh55134
|
21 |
|
kevinsdomain
|
21 |
|
Loopylime
|
21 |
|
Matchbeak
|
21 |
|
Noelthemexican
|
21 |
|
PattyKane16
|
21 |
|
Pyroblockx
|
21 |
|
RadiationRichard
|
21 |
LW - 12 |
readonlypdf
|
21 |
|
RootBeerBloat
|
21 |
|
schneeplehoppen
|
21 |
|
Scruggerboy
|
21 |
|
siggyrambler
|
21 |
|
SignificanceFirm2398
|
21 |
|
Starwarsewok
|
21 |
|
tbutrie1916
|
21 |
|
TheBeekman8
|
21 |
Louisville what happened |
thefarsideinside
|
21 |
|
Thehomelessguy11
|
21 |
|
thejawa
|
21 |
|
ViewFrom209
|
21 |
|
70277027
|
22 |
|
a_bit_of_a_misnomer_
|
22 |
How do you go from beating Notre Dame to losing to 1-4 Pitt? They have a bye, but Duke could be a challenge. |
AdministrativeAnt683
|
22 |
|
BananaBouquet
|
22 |
|
BoilerUp28
|
22 |
|
carsonivey72
|
22 |
|
Chipsahoy523
|
22 |
|
Dobbins
|
22 |
|
evil_muffins_5436
|
22 |
|
FsuNolezz
|
22 |
|
heelxtiger
|
22 |
62.3 |
hoovereatscowpoop
|
22 |
|
hurricaneatx
|
22 |
(4-1) |
irulethelemons
|
22 |
|
MrSirPablo
|
22 |
kind of a mickey mouse schedule but I prefer them over a 2 loss team |
newSomberMan
|
22 |
|
Piptit
|
22 |
|
Player_1_has_Joined
|
22 |
|
stew_pac
|
22 |
-11 |
Tight_Discipline_134
|
22 |
|
titansfan174
|
22 |
|
Viselli
|
22 |
|
WillWorkForSugar
|
22 |
|
1Subject
|
23 |
|
_TGT7
|
23 |
-8, Unranking Louisville would be harsh, but if someone did after a convincing loss to a absolutely god-awful Pitt team, I wouldn’t blame them, only rationale I can think of is that they overlooked Pitt, and were looking at how to beat Duke in 2 weeks. Will be interesting to see how they regroup during the Duke game. |
Aggravating-Steak-69
|
23 |
|
Arvandu
|
23 |
(-11) |
Beck4ou
|
23 |
|
bethe2ndmouse
|
23 |
|
Cooliamabeast
|
23 |
|
demolisty24
|
23 |
|
diehardcubforever
|
23 |
|
donbagert
|
23 |
|
dterp13
|
23 |
|
Fantastic-Calendar-9
|
23 |
LW: 11, classic Louisville choke |
grahamca
|
23 |
T12ᵗʰ W/L, T21ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 36ᵗʰ Team Strength, 30ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
JamoRedhead
|
23 |
|
Jay682002
|
23 |
|
KansasChaser2021
|
23 |
|
leadbymight
|
23 |
|
LonghornInNebraska
|
23 |
|
MuhMuhManRay
|
23 |
|
redrumsoxLoL
|
23 |
|
ScaratheBear
|
23 |
|
sleemoislife
|
23 |
Ouch that pitt loss is a bad look |
spaceblev11
|
23 |
|
The_Stratman
|
23 |
|
TheSunsNotYellow
|
23 |
.545 |
TommyTwoTaps
|
23 |
|
twr96
|
23 |
|
bostonboy08
|
24 |
|
bruhstevenson
|
24 |
|
chillmagic420
|
24 |
|
Dontworryaboutit1
|
24 |
|
ianmcmoney
|
24 |
|
Icyy19_
|
24 |
|
IDropFatLogs
|
24 |
|
Klaassy23
|
24 |
(LW Change: -11) |
manbeardawg
|
24 |
|
mill1634
|
24 |
|
Mini-Mussolini
|
24 |
|
mport97
|
24 |
|
Ok_Elderberry7070
|
24 |
|
pianoprofiteer
|
24 |
|
samspopguy
|
24 |
|
Sflabuckeye13
|
24 |
|
SIMBONEGTP
|
24 |
|
Soggy_Seagull
|
24 |
|
SomerandomIDFBfan
|
24 |
LW 12 |
Xy13
|
24 |
|
10catsinspace
|
25 |
|
ActuallyJasonPrice
|
25 |
|
Aidanj927
|
25 |
|
Astone1996
|
25 |
|
CALL_ME_ISHMAEBY
|
25 |
|
CaptainScuttlebottom
|
25 |
I just can't figure out how good ND is supposed to be, so I'm leaving them ranked for now on the assumption that ND is pretty good and Louisville must be too because they handled ND well. |
Doogitywoogity
|
25 |
You shouldn’t be ranked, but you’re the last relevant team left so I suppose |
DragonFire101Gamer
|
25 |
|
IBCBJ
|
25 |
|
jaowerpower
|
25 |
|
Josh_historybuff
|
25 |
|
luciusetrur
|
25 |
LW: 12 |
maknasty09
|
25 |
|
moyboi2112
|
25 |
Lots of G5s hanging around, waiting for all of the P5 schools to lose |
narwhalz27
|
25 |
v 6 |
PerfectZeroKnowledge
|
25 |
|
Scott72901
|
25 |
|
SpencoDaMainMan
|
25 |
While they are 6-1, a bad loss to Pitt is not making them look any good. They're still in contention, but need to prove it going forward. |
tcomn
|
25 |
|
TheNSAAgent777
|
25 |
|
VietnameseAnglo
|
25 |
|
Weekly_Flatworm5707
|
25 |
|
WhalePadre5
|
25 |
|
xX_GIGA_MAN_Xx
|
25 |
WVU beat pitt man, its not hard |
Yelich04
|
25 |
|
Yung_Carrot
|
25 |
|
ziggysaysnada
|
25 |
|