Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2022, 7:27 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Using Beta_Rank as a template but factoring in coaching changes/transfers
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
It's Alabama |
2 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank had Ohio State at number 3 behind Georgia, but I gave the nod to the Buckeyes due to CJ Stroud |
3 |
![]() |
Replacing a lot of production on defense, but they've been recruiting at a level high enough to keep it rolling |
4 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank has Clemson at number 4, which does feel high but I don't see a compelling option to put ahead of them. Defense will be stout as always, just need to get some better production from the QB position. |
5 |
![]() |
Replacing a ton on defense, but the offense should be able to replicate what it did last year |
6 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank has the Utes at number 9, but I slid them ahead of a couple of teams that had coaching changes. |
7 |
![]() |
This will definitely be controversial, but Beta_Rank has them at number 10. Mike Leach's offense should be able to hit the ground running in year 3, and their defense should be an improvement over last year given the amount of returning production. |
8 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank had them at number 5, decided to slide them down a couple spots due to having a 1st time head coach. |
9 |
![]() |
Similar to Notre Dame, Oklahoma was Beta_Rank's 8th best team |
10 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank's number 29 team gets a huge bump here due to the coaching change and influx of transfers. The model isn't equipped to handle such a massive change. There are questions on defense but offensively they should be really good. |
11 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #11 |
12 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #12 |
13 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #13 |
14 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #14 - could have dropped them a couple spots due to having a 1st time head coach, but decided to leave them here |
15 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #15 |
16 |
![]() |
Beta Rank #6, which felt way, way too high. Brian Kelly can coach but it remains to be seen if he can fit the culture there |
17 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #19, I like the Cristobal hire |
18 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #16. Sliding down a tad because the boosters are looking for any reason to fire the coach, so essentially Auburn being Auburn. Also is Calzada an upgrade over Bo Nix? A downgrade? I have no idea. |
19 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank had them clear down at number 50 but it would be silly to have them unranked. Dave Aranda gets the benefit of the doubt here |
20 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #18 |
21 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #17, slid NC State ahead of them because they have more returning production |
22 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #25, sure I'll buy the hype on Ewers |
23 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #32 but I trust DeBoer to fix that offense, which was horrendous last season |
24 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #24 |
25 |
![]() |
Beta_Rank #22 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
16.38 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
1.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.49 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
6.33 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
6.88 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.99 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.26 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.19 |
23 |
![]() |
2.02 |
24 |
![]() |
0.84 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.06 |
![]() |
0.76 |
![]() |
0.70 |
![]() |
0.56 |
![]() |
0.41 |
![]() |
0.26 |
![]() |
0.18 |
Total Score: 40.31