Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2026, 10:57 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Reports from Fall Camp, Talent Carryover, Coaching Staff, Schedule as a whole when doing preseason only, after preseason it becomes based on the body of work
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
|
| 2 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
One of the easiest schedules in the country, great coaching, great talent |
| 3 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
Same as miami, easy schedule with great coaching and talent |
| 4 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
Lots of returning young talent and Kirby has proven himself as a coach |
| 5 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
|
| 6 |
Oregon Ducks
|
Questions regarding QB and offense after Will Stein left |
| 7 |
Texas Longhorns
|
Lots of potential, unlike what the media says it isnt so much about Arch for me as it is the offensive line and while I believe they can get it done to win I dont know how many games it will cost them |
| 8 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
Team looks great this year and will likely win the big 12, though they certainly wont win any PR contests |
| 9 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
Amazing defense, likely top 5 in the sport, offense has questions. If they can get the offense going easily can win it all. |
| 10 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
Talent for a playoff run, questions surround new coach |
| 11 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
|
| 12 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
Whittingham is a proven coach and Michigan enables him to get the talent he needs to go all out |
| 13 |
BYU Cougars
|
|
| 14 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
Young QB keeps em in the teens, good defense will carry them to wins, I dont know if the offense will be good enough for a playoff berth |
| 15 |
LSU Tigers
|
Lots of talent but also lots of questions, Kiffin’s consistency in stretches of difficult games, something he never really had to deal with at Ole Miss and how he responds to trap games. Leavitt’s leg injury is still something I have questions on. |
| 16 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
Rhule is a good coach but it remains to be seen if the talent he brought over from Iowa State will be enough to finish above teens |
| 17 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
Don’t see Deboer doing great for Alabama expectations, 8-4 9-3 miss the playoffs and the fans who got used to Saban will be going crazy |
| 18 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
Brohm is a solid coach, Louisville has good talent and I think the only ACC team that could possibly beat Miami |
| 19 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
Same ol Iowa, very dependable to be in the high teens/low 20s. Safe bet to put here. |
| 20 |
UCLA Bruins
|
Cheney is an up and comer I have a lot of faith in this season, I wouldnt be surprised to see UCLA finish top 25 |
| 21 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
Best G6 team imo, I think they will be the playoff bid for the G6 |
| 22 |
California Golden Bears
|
Another up and coming coach I’m gambling on with the preseason poll, I think Lupoi can bring Cal back to some level of prominence |
| 23 |
Missouri Tigers
|
Much of Drink’s success came from his former OC, unsure what results will be with new OC and Hardy injury likely taking him out at least 3-4 weeks based on Drink’s comment at Media Days |
| 24 |
Utah Utes
|
New coach dont know what to expect bur B12 feels weak this year and could potentially do well enough for top 25 finish |
| 25 |
USC Trojans
|
Fall camp injuries hurting outlook |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.05 |
| 2 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.88 |
| 3 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
0.00 |
| 4 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.00 |
| 5 |
Indiana Hoosiers
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Oregon Ducks
|
-1.37 |
| 7 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Texas Tech Red Raiders
|
0.01 |
| 9 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
0.03 |
| 10 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
0.00 |
| 11 |
Texas A&M Aggies
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
0.49 |
| 13 |
BYU Cougars
|
0.00 |
| 14 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
0.80 |
| 15 |
LSU Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
0.34 |
| 17 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
-0.58 |
| 18 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
0.70 |
| 19 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
0.25 |
| 20 |
UCLA Bruins
|
5.21 |
| 21 |
Navy Midshipmen
|
3.90 |
| 22 |
California Golden Bears
|
2.96 |
| 23 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 24 |
Utah Utes
|
0.00 |
| 25 |
USC Trojans
|
-1.87 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Washington Huskies
|
0.96 |
SMU Mustangs
|
0.79 |
Houston Cougars
|
0.31 |
Total Score: 21.51