Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2017, 5:36 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Still heavily based in conjecture and previous seasons/recruiting. Currently weighting how well a team plays over who they beat/lost to.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Beat a solid FSU team, but wasn't truly dominant. Definitely beatable and will be interesting how they react to losing some depth on the D. |
2 |
![]() |
Played well against an overmatched team. We'll see if the offense truly is just reloading against Auburn's D. |
3 |
![]() |
Looked good against an overmatched team. Didn't struggle unlike some other teams |
4 |
![]() |
Didn't look particularly crisp against mediocre competition, and still haven't seen JT Barrett make throws down the field. If he doesn't progress, they are likely to drop as the season goes on. |
5 |
![]() |
Not completely sold on OU without Stoops, but we'll get a good idea where they stand this weekend. |
6 |
![]() |
Struggled against a WMU team that flew across country and I'm expecting to have a significant drop off this year. |
7 |
![]() |
Probably a little too high, but they looked damn good against Rice. Doesn't seem to be much of a drop off to their new RB, and, with a solid schedule that's definitely manageable, should be fighting for a playoff spot all year  |
8 |
![]() |
Looks good against a not-terrible Tulsa team before letting their foot off the gas. Not sure if they have to depth to go all the way, but looking good right now |
9 |
![]() |
They hung with Bama until the turnovers caused the levy to break. HUGE loss with Francois going down, but giving them the benefit of the doubt until we see the frosh play |
10 |
![]() |
Maybe too high here, because Florida was missing half their team and still have yet to figure out this "offense" thing |
11 |
![]() |
TCB with overmatched team. We'll see where they fit next week |
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Not going to lie, I /really/ couldn't find anyone I wanted to put here, so we'll go with Maryland on the off chance that Texas isn't terrible again. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.20 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.49 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.80 |
15 |
![]() |
0.24 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.06 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.59 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.60 |
![]() |
0.04 |
Total Score: 3.03