Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2017, 5:02 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Teams move up and down each week based on how actual MOV compares to predicted MOV. MOV is capped at 35. The number is somewhat arbitrary but 5 TDs is my subjective judgment of the point where a greater MOV doesn't really tell us anything more about how good teams really are. There is a preseason component based on last year's final rankings, returning production, recruiting rankings, and coach rankings. The preseason component will be removed halfway through the season and rankings will be recalculated with each team starting exactly equal. I am happy to answer any further questions about the poll.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
(-) Not possible to go higher than #1. |
2 |
![]() |
(-) Took care of business. |
3 |
![]() |
(-) Losses to Bama don't count. Seriously, that's the way the math works in this poll. A loss to #1 cannot influence your ranking (neither can a win over #130 or an FCS team). Also, the formula doesn't know about injuries. |
4 |
![]() |
(+1) due to USC's drop. |
5 |
![]() |
(+1) due to USC's drop. |
6 |
![]() |
(-2) due to keeping it too close against WMU. |
7 |
![]() |
(+2) Computer doesn't care that it was close for 2.5 quarters. |
8 |
![]() |
(-1) .Kept it too close against Rutgers, but mainly dropped just as a result of tOSU's rise. |
9 |
![]() |
(-1) due to tOSU passing them. |
10 |
![]() |
(+3) Solid win, even over a decimated UF roster. |
11 |
![]() |
(-) |
12 |
![]() |
(-2) |
13 |
![]() |
(+1) |
14 |
![]() |
(+3) Blew out a Tulsa team who got 10 wins last year. |
15 |
![]() |
(+1) |
16 |
![]() |
(+2) |
17 |
![]() |
(+2) |
18 |
![]() |
(-3) Lost to a good team so they don't fall too far. |
19 |
![]() |
(-7) Can you believe they let some broad named Beth Cook score 13 points all by herself? (Serious explanation, predicted margin was 35, computer doesn't take too kindly to those who underperform against FCS or very bad FBS opponents). |
20 |
![]() |
(-) |
21 |
![]() |
(+3) NC St was preseason #32 in this model so that's a solid win. |
22 |
![]() |
(+1) As bad as it was to allow that comeback, all the formula knows is they lost by 1 point to a decent team. And they rise (as do the three remaining teams) due to Texas and VT falling. |
23 |
![]() |
(+2) |
24 |
![]() |
(+2) |
25 |
![]() |
(+2) I'll note here that VT fell to 26 because the computer thinks WVU is bad and VT should have beat them by more. I think the preseason data I used didn't take Will Grier into account properly. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
1.14 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.52 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.01 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.30 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.53 |
16 |
![]() |
1.87 |
17 |
![]() |
1.17 |
18 |
![]() |
1.78 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
1.77 |
21 |
![]() |
1.71 |
22 |
![]() |
3.14 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.93 |
25 |
![]() |
0.04 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.95 |
![]() |
1.19 |
![]() |
0.95 |
![]() |
0.60 |
![]() |
0.30 |
![]() |
0.01 |
Total Score: 20.38