Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Aug. 19, 2019, 3:37 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the final rankings output by my computer ranking for the last 3 seasons, with a medium-ish adjustment for recruiting rankings and a small adjustment for returning talent. This ranking will highly reward teams that have been consistently decent. Example, Stanford at 12 might be unconventional, but they are one of a few teams to finish each of the last 3 seasons top25 by my computer ranking. Most teams are going to have a bad year (Notre Dame 2016, Florida 2017) or mediocre years (Texas A&M 2017, Miami 2018) that harm their overall average. I therefore consider these teams to be safe bets at consistency, rather than an actual prediction of final rankings.
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.15 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.37 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.92 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
3.13 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.04 |
14 |
![]() |
0.12 |
15 |
![]() |
2.52 |
16 |
![]() |
-0.71 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.12 |
19 |
![]() |
4.58 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
1.17 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.66 |
25 |
![]() |
0.10 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.29 |
![]() |
1.72 |
![]() |
0.53 |
![]() |
0.36 |
![]() |
0.41 |
![]() |
0.03 |
Total Score: 19.93