Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Aug. 19, 2018, 6:53 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Disclaimer: I think preseason polls are dumb because all we have to go on is what teams have said to the media all off-season. I prefer to let on-field results speak for themselves. The opinions contained below reflect my attempt to over-correct for all the hype and propaganda we've been basking in since January. This poll isn't supposed to be a joke, but it is supposed to expose the problems I see with preseason polls in general. My controversy score will probably be higher than I'm aiming for, but I am still trying to keep it down. I promise the real poll during the season will make much more sense.Put differently, the poll below isn't *too* far from what I think is reasonable, but who can say for sure when we haven't seen anyone play yet?Human poll while my computer poll gorges itself on early-season data. Around week 1-2 I'll switch to hybrid as I tweak settings and manually shift teams around slightly to correct the algorithm, but I'll start listing my algorithm's scores at that point. The first week when I don't make any manual adjustments, I'll switch it to computer. That should be around week 4-6. Expect it to start aligning more closely with the consensus by week 9-10.There is method behind my madness, my rationale is based on the idea that a poll should be predictive, not just descriptive. In service to that idea, I focus on team-level statistics like wins, strength of opponent, and where a team is likely to finish in conference based on all the other statistics. Individual statistics I believe are more subject to variability, and can't be relied upon to predict the results of games week-to-week.Algorithm status: testing and tweaking using old/hypothetical dataAlgorithm completion: 82%SettingsGrowth: 22.5%Ranked: 22.0%Undefeated: 36.0%Loss Quality: 5.5%Road Trip: 18%
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Washington Huskies
|
If they win all their games they'll be the undisputed #1. For now they're #1 because everyone else tried too hard to not be #1. See below. |
| 2 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
Would be #1 but their RB just tore his ACL. |
| 3 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
Dropped a few spots because Nick Saban can't "just s*** out" linebackers. |
| 4 |
Clemson Tigers
|
After their playoff embarrassment, they need to prove themselves first. That will be tricky given their relatively weak schedule. |
| 5 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
Probably shouldn't be this high. See notes below. |
| 6 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
Not sure about Urban yet. In a vacuum they're #2 or so. |
| 7 |
Auburn Tigers
|
Can't put them higher because they lost to UCF. Can't put them lower because they haven't had any offseason problems, really. |
| 8 |
Wisconsin Badgers
|
Dropped a few spots after the news about their top receiver. |
| 9 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
9-19 or so are very uncertain for me. Any of these teams could go 12-1 or 8-4. Don't worry about the order. Note that not many of these teams had a lot of media coverage this off-season. |
| 10 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
|
| 11 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
|
| 12 |
Mississippi State Bulldogs
|
|
| 13 |
Virginia Tech Hokies
|
|
| 14 |
West Virginia Mountaineers
|
|
| 15 |
Stanford Cardinal
|
They have a returning Stanford Heisman (TM) winner and some engineering schematics titled "Success". |
| 16 |
Michigan State Spartans
|
|
| 17 |
Florida State Seminoles
|
|
| 18 |
Oklahoma State Cowboys
|
|
| 19 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
Why is Michigan at the back of the 9-19 bloc? Shea Patterson. |
| 20 |
FAU Owls
|
The Fightin' Freshwaters have no excuse not to run away with the C-USA and land in a NY6. |
| 21 |
USC Trojans
|
The Darnold's offensive line and receiver corps made him look much better than he actually is. Most of them are still around. USC isn't going away yet. |
| 22 |
UCF Knights
|
Frost held this team together. Heupel doesn't do defense. UCF will lose some shootouts. |
| 23 |
Oregon Ducks
|
|
| 24 |
Purdue Boilermakers
|
Apparently there's a hype train? No, I mean a literal train. A steam locomotive. Because they make boilers? You know what, forget I said anything. |
| 25 |
Boise State Broncos
|
What poll would be complete without the most consistent G5 team at #25? |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Washington Huskies
|
1.06 |
| 2 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.15 |
| 3 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
-0.90 |
| 4 |
Clemson Tigers
|
-0.55 |
| 5 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
Auburn Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 8 |
Wisconsin Badgers
|
0.00 |
| 9 |
TCU Horned Frogs
|
0.90 |
| 10 |
Miami Hurricanes
|
0.00 |
| 11 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Mississippi State Bulldogs
|
1.04 |
| 13 |
Virginia Tech Hokies
|
1.01 |
| 14 |
West Virginia Mountaineers
|
0.47 |
| 15 |
Stanford Cardinal
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
Michigan State Spartans
|
-0.17 |
| 17 |
Florida State Seminoles
|
0.50 |
| 18 |
Oklahoma State Cowboys
|
0.12 |
| 19 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
-0.28 |
| 20 |
FAU Owls
|
1.86 |
| 21 |
USC Trojans
|
-0.65 |
| 22 |
UCF Knights
|
0.00 |
| 23 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.00 |
| 24 |
Purdue Boilermakers
|
1.06 |
| 25 |
Boise State Broncos
|
-0.05 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
2.80 |
LSU Tigers
|
0.32 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.00 |
Total Score: 13.90