Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2016, 10:58 a.m.
Overall Rationale: While generally predictive projections of the final rankings, since it is week one, these rankings do not allow a loss; there is not enough of a body of work for 1 loss teams to be in the top 25 at this point.  
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
Holy shit with that win |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
I know they were beating up on nobody, but 8 TDs in a half by 1 player is terrifying |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
A close win against a good team in week 1 is not reason to overreact like the sky is falling.   |
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
The current SEC leaders are required to be ranked by federal law, aren't they? |
24 |
![]() |
As with Kansas, pointing out that my own contrived rule of having a win, alongside the crazy that is college football, makes this poll next to meaningless.   |
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.67 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.86 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
1.34 |
7 |
![]() |
0.42 |
8 |
![]() |
-0.24 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
10 |
![]() |
0.02 |
11 |
![]() |
7.13 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.61 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
1.45 |
17 |
![]() |
-2.25 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
5.89 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.99 |
22 |
![]() |
3.05 |
23 |
![]() |
1.95 |
24 |
![]() |
1.23 |
25 |
![]() |
0.09 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.11 |
![]() |
0.93 |
![]() |
0.74 |
![]() |
0.71 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.37 |
![]() |
0.28 |
Total Score: 36.20