Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Aug. 23, 2016, 8:22 a.m.
Overall Rationale: This is a preseason poll. Except DRASTIC changes from week-to-week early in the season. Based on quality of last season's teams, while also taking into account where I expect regression based on lost talent, and improvement based on growing talent and experience, plus recruitment. I will NOT take into account a team's strength of schedule for the upcoming season (sorry Washington, Michigan, you would both be higher) 
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
You'd have to lose a lot to lose the top spot in my poll as champions. They lose some, but I expect them to reload. Might start shaky, expect that to wear off quick. |
2 |
![]() |
Everything about them is wonderful and I hate it. |
3 |
![]() |
I expect big things and I think they will start right where they left off (good, not losing to Clemson I mean) |
4 |
![]() |
A sexy pick, I know, but Michigan's foundations last year will yield some fruit |
5 |
![]() |
The quarterback situation is dicey, but they have one of the best players doing everything else. |
6 |
![]() |
The quarterback situation is REALLY dicey, but they have one of the best players running around on offense. |
7 |
![]() |
A lack of skill position players is very concerning, but Freeze's high-level recruiting is yielding results. Expect to see a quality team that I think has a good chance of beating Florida State. |
8 |
![]() |
Lose a lot, recruit a lot. Ho hum.  |
9 |
![]() |
They have a lot that I like, but a lot that worries me. They have so much talent on paper to make the playoff, but I have reservations. I always will with UCLA. |
10 |
![]() |
Big losses, but Sparty is resilient. Sparty strong |
11 |
![]() |
Gettin disrespekt. I will recognize real. |
12 |
![]() |
Overrated in other polls that take schedule too much into account. However, they have a literal human wrecking ball at running back |
13 |
![]() |
Also overrated and the Dobbs hype is legitimately confounding |
14 |
![]() |
Losing talent, but consistently well-coached. I admit I'm not sure at all how the Frogs will do this season |
15 |
![]() |
Even post-Fulmer Cup glory, the Irish look solid, but not great. |
16 |
![]() |
I think some regression is obvious with this team, but Kirk will do what Kirk will do and they will win some scrappy games. |
17 |
![]() |
A weird end to the season doesn't mean Utah won't be a solid season. I'm more taking into account their season last year than anything else, but I think a record around or slightly under their performance last season is a respectable, achievable goal. |
18 |
![]() |
Oregon's development over the long-run is very concerning, but they have so much talent it's impossible to keep them out of the the top 20 or so. |
19 |
![]() |
Another tough, confounding team to rank. I think they are slightly underrated by the AP. Florida's defense is world-class despite some lost talent. McElwain has had a year to recruit offensive talent to his strengths. I see an SEC East repeat unlikely, and the QB situation is just as poor, if not worse than Georgia's. 8-4 sounds reasonable as well. Don't ask me who wins the Cocktail Party.  |
20 |
![]() |
I have no idea what to do with Georgia and I will say nothing more. Ok I will say their defense and offense both have really great strengths and weird weaknesses and the QB situation is concerning despite the hype. I think it'll be an 8-4 year out of the Bulldogs when all's said and done but this poll takes into account last year's finish minus loss, plus additions. Georgia loses a few on defense, and needs to sort out offensive line, but healthy players and returning veterans in the secondary, at linebacker and elsewhere along the lines means Georgia will be a pretty decent team for Kirby Smart's first year. |
21 |
![]() |
A sexy quarterback I hear? A dumpster fire of a defense, I remember. |
22 |
![]() |
Who knows in a tough division if the Cougs repeat their secretly awesome year? I don't, but I respect them and their secret-decency. |
23 |
![]() |
Another sneaky team, that I can see sniping some games they shouldn't, but their last month or so has games in Manhattan, Fort Worth and Norman (not that home field means anything in Bedlam). I think they could be good, but I would not be shocked if they weren't |
24 |
![]() |
NO idea if they will be good this year with a lame head-coaching hire, but a talent loaded roster means they will stay here as division champs until they get a good old slaughtering Week 1. |
25 |
![]() |
25 was tough. I thought about Pitt, though, who I like winning a few close games and really developing this year. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.48 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.60 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
1.19 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-1.03 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.08 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
4.62 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.37 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.73 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.43 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.10 |
![]() |
0.68 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Total Score: 11.32