Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2023, 11:20 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Still mostly vibes, data will start taking center stage in week 5
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
“To be the man, you gotta beat the man” |
2 |
![]() |
Huge win in a true road game |
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
They have been excellent, very efficient in offense |
6 |
![]() |
Sam Hartman… so handsome |
7 |
![]() |
That was a quality win, Troy has a very good defense |
8 |
![]() |
Computer data really likes Oklahoma so far, shutting out an FBS team is really hard, beating an FBS team by 60+ is also really hard, doing both is exceedingly rare. I’ve tamped down their place a bit, but SMU is a quality win too, so they crack the top 10 |
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
Haven’t looked great on offense yet |
11 |
![]() |
Game at Baylor was a better win than they are getting credit for, I think. For a team from Utah to pull off the win in that heat/humidity is impressive. |
12 |
![]() |
Defense bad… |
13 |
![]() |
A lot to prove, but the potential is there |
14 |
![]() |
Boy they need to improve on both lines to get back in playoff contention |
15 |
![]() |
Nice win, OL looks much improved |
16 |
![]() |
Let’s see where this goes… |
17 |
![]() |
Maybe unfair to be this low, FSU is legit, losing to them is ok. |
18 |
![]() |
Top of the PAC is going to be fun when they start playing head to head. |
19 |
![]() |
Tulane game much closer than it appeared, and against a back-up QB |
20 |
![]() |
Not bad, not great, Bo Nix not great last week |
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
Defense isn’t good, they clearly knew South Carolina’s plays the week before thanks to Kitchen. Impressive running game, but offense was never the issue. |
23 |
![]() |
Hung with a good team with a back-up QB |
24 |
![]() |
Seem to be improved on defense, next week against BYU will teach us a lot |
25 |
![]() |
Nice win |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.34 |
6 |
![]() |
0.14 |
7 |
![]() |
1.42 |
8 |
![]() |
1.29 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-1.26 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.24 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
-1.10 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
1.92 |
24 |
![]() |
0.85 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.22 |
![]() |
0.02 |
![]() |
0.05 |
Total Score: 8.86