Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2023, 1:05 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Still a heavy lean towards returning production (TARP), player talent and coaching ability. Now we add in results and the “eye test” of how well top teams controlled games that they played. Scores do not paint the entire picture.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Controlled their game better and looked like the top team |
2 |
![]() |
Slow beginning against a bad team, won’t penalize too much without key coaching staff members |
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
Impressive opening win against a good team |
5 |
![]() |
Unimpressive performance against a potential division basement-dweller. |
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
Played well for a half, missing key players but looked outmatched against quality opposition |
14 |
![]() |
Under appreciated win against a good South Alabama team returning lots of talent |
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
Good home win against a questionable Clemson team that made a lot of mistakes. |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
Handled their game well while incorporating DJU |
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Went on the road and took down a tough team that appeared in the NC last year. Next 5: 26. Fresno State 27. Wyoming 28. BYU 29. Illinois 30. Clemson |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.28 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.73 |
14 |
![]() |
0.75 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
-1.20 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.03 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
2.03 |
24 |
![]() |
-1.10 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
No major omissions.
Total Score: 6.12