Back to poll results >>

digdat0 Ballot for 2026 Week 6

Ballot Type: Computer

Submitted: Oct. 4, 2026, 9:34 a.m.

Overall Rationale: This ranking measures how good each team is right now. Its biggest input is opponent-adjusted scoring: how many points a team scores and allows compared with what its opponents usually give up and score. That is combined with results, strength of schedule, quality of wins and losses, and recent form. It adjusts for home field, limits the effect of blowouts, gives more credit for beating highly ranked opponents, and penalizes bad losses. Recent games count more than early ones. Early-season rankings lean partly on preseason ratings and can look odd until more games are played.

Rank Team Reason
1 Alabama Crimson Tide 1. Alabama — Score: 0.317 | Results: 1.796, SOS Rank: #6, Quality: 0.256, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 3, Off Rk: #1, Def Rk: #20
2 Texas Longhorns 2. Texas — Score: 0.280 | Results: 1.651, SOS Rank: #2, Quality: 0.271, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 1, T25W: 2, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #48, Def Rk: #1
3 Notre Dame Fighting Irish 3. Notre Dame — Score: 0.250 | Results: 1.706, SOS Rank: #37, Quality: 0.134, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #7, Def Rk: #5
4 Miami Hurricanes 4. Miami — Score: 0.231 | Results: 1.587, SOS Rank: #86, Quality: 0.089, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #4, Def Rk: #17
5 Texas Tech Red Raiders 5. Texas Tech — Score: 0.219 | Results: 1.588, SOS Rank: #38, Quality: 0.143, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #19, Def Rk: #9
6 Indiana Hoosiers 6. Indiana — Score: 0.213 | Results: 1.499, SOS Rank: #90, Quality: 0.115, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #23, Def Rk: #2
7 Georgia Bulldogs 7. Georgia — Score: 0.199 | Results: 1.556, SOS Rank: #111, Quality: 0.060, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 0, Off Rk: #2, Def Rk: #48
8 Ohio State Buckeyes 8. Ohio State — Score: 0.195 | Results: 1.182, SOS Rank: #44, Quality: 0.071, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #5, Def Rk: #22
9 Utah Utes 9. Utah — Score: 0.188 | Results: 1.549, SOS Rank: #104, Quality: 0.051, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 0, Off Rk: #21, Def Rk: #3
10 Oregon Ducks 10. Oregon — Score: 0.182 | Results: 0.886, SOS Rank: #30, Quality: 0.153, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #10, Def Rk: #73
11 LSU Tigers 11. LSU — Score: 0.182 | Results: 0.996, SOS Rank: #58, Quality: 0.073, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #9, Def Rk: #25
12 Nebraska Cornhuskers 12. Nebraska — Score: 0.179 | Results: 1.547, SOS Rank: #82, Quality: 0.019, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 0, Off Rk: #8, Def Rk: #24
13 Pittsburgh Panthers 13. Pittsburgh — Score: 0.177 | Results: 1.433, SOS Rank: #66, Quality: 0.103, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #38, Def Rk: #30
14 Missouri Tigers 14. Missouri — Score: 0.172 | Results: 1.019, SOS Rank: #16, Quality: 0.102, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #24, Def Rk: #10
15 BYU Cougars 15. BYU — Score: 0.171 | Results: 1.525, SOS Rank: #95, Quality: 0.094, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #54, Def Rk: #8
16 Houston Cougars 16. Houston — Score: 0.171 | Results: 1.031, SOS Rank: #22, Quality: 0.125, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #13, Def Rk: #42
17 UCLA Bruins 17. UCLA — Score: 0.165 | Results: 1.626, SOS Rank: #97, Quality: 0.010, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 0, Off Rk: #12, Def Rk: #50
18 James Madison Dukes 18. James Madison — Score: 0.159 | Results: 1.437, SOS Rank: #123, Quality: 0.047, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #16, Def Rk: #52
19 Northwestern Wildcats 19. Northwestern — Score: 0.146 | Results: 0.894, SOS Rank: #3, Quality: 0.060, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #18, Def Rk: #11
20 Wisconsin Badgers 20. Wisconsin — Score: 0.141 | Results: 1.125, SOS Rank: #24, Quality: 0.044, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #33, Def Rk: #12
21 Boise State Broncos 21. Boise State — Score: 0.139 | Results: 1.150, SOS Rank: #26, Quality: 0.058, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #29, Def Rk: #28
22 Florida Gators 22. Florida — Score: 0.136 | Results: 0.911, SOS Rank: #7, Quality: 0.132, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #3, Def Rk: #97
23 Mississippi State Bulldogs 23. Mississippi State — Score: 0.127 | Results: 0.901, SOS Rank: #12, Quality: 0.153, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 1, T50W: 2, Off Rk: #15, Def Rk: #69
24 Oklahoma State Cowboys 24. Oklahoma State — Score: 0.127 | Results: 0.908, SOS Rank: #77, Quality: 0.087, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 1, T25W: 1, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #52, Def Rk: #44
25 Tennessee Volunteers 25. Tennessee — Score: 0.127 | Results: 0.947, SOS Rank: #53, Quality: 0.052, Recency: 0.000 | T10W: 0, T25W: 0, T50W: 1, Off Rk: #17, Def Rk: #31

Back to poll results >>