Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 17, 2023, 4:07 p.m.
Overall Rationale: 1/2 Accelerated ELO, 1/4 FPI, 1/4 SP+
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
25.9 (-1.8), - |
2 |
![]() |
24.8 (+3.6), +8 |
3 |
![]() |
24.2 (+0.6), - |
4 |
![]() |
23.9 (+1.3), +1 |
5 |
![]() |
23.4 (-3.6), -3 |
6 |
![]() |
23.3 (+0.2), -2 |
7 |
![]() |
22.7 (+1.0), +1 |
8 |
![]() |
21.7 (+0.4), +1 |
9 |
![]() |
21.4 (+0.9), +2 |
10 |
![]() |
20.6 (-1.4), -3 |
11 |
![]() |
19.4 (-2.9), -5; My model currently treats all FCS teams as equal, and Stanford lost to (one of the best FCS teams in) Sacramento State. So USC's strength of schedule to this point dropped off a cliff over the bye week. My goal is to have Accelerated ELO for FCS teams next year. Regardless, USC still would have dropped to around 8th. |
12 |
![]() |
19.2 (+0.8), +2 |
13 |
![]() |
18.6 (+1.2), +2 |
14 |
![]() |
18.4 (+2.4), +4 |
15 |
![]() |
17.9 (-1.5), -2 |
16 |
![]() |
17.3, NR |
17 |
![]() |
17.1 (-2.9), -5 |
18 |
![]() |
16.0 (+2.8), +5 |
19 |
![]() |
15.7 (+2.1), +3 |
20 |
![]() |
14.9 (+0.7), - |
21 |
![]() |
14.0 (-0.6), -2 |
22 |
![]() |
13.9 (-2.9), -5 |
23 |
![]() |
13.2, NR |
24 |
![]() |
12.4, NR |
25 |
![]() |
12.4, NR; Honorable Mentions: Florida (11.9), Louisville (11.5) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.36 |
2 |
![]() |
0.45 |
3 |
![]() |
0.20 |
4 |
![]() |
1.28 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
1.20 |
8 |
![]() |
-0.03 |
9 |
![]() |
1.03 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.03 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-1.30 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
2.32 |
21 |
![]() |
1.49 |
22 |
![]() |
-1.17 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.01 |
24 |
![]() |
0.99 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.51 |
![]() |
0.20 |
![]() |
0.01 |
Total Score: 12.58