Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2023, 4:07 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I ran into some issues with my Elo model, so until I have time to sit down and figure that out, I'm going off of pure vibes.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
I honestly think they should be #1 until they lose a game. The last two years have earned them some benefit of the doubt, even though they ain't played nobody. |
2 |
![]() |
Most impressive win of the season so far + good on paper + meeting eye test. |
3 |
![]() |
Self explanatory IMO |
4 |
![]() |
Mostly self explanatory IMO; I think they looked great over LSU. |
5 |
![]() |
Self explanatory IMO |
6 |
![]() |
I'm not going to knock them too bad for losing a pretty close on to Texas, since I think Texas is really good. |
7 |
![]() |
Self explanatory IMO, they looked quite good against WVU and I think WVU is underrated a little. Very talented team also. |
8 |
![]() |
Self explanatory IMO. They looked good but maybe not elite against their first real opponent NC State. |
9 |
![]() |
I think they have the most impressive PAC-12 resume so far, but it's very close. Neither of their opponents were very good, but they blew them tf out. |
10 |
![]() |
They would be ahead of USC if they had beaten Baylor just a little more soundly. They looked great against Florida, though. |
11 |
![]() |
Another hard to rank PAC-12 team. #9-#12 are very very close here. |
12 |
![]() |
Really debated moving them up above the rest of the PAC-12 just because I feel like they've had more opportunities to prove themselves. However, I'm considering their two opponents to be pretty unimpressive ATM, so the jury is still out on them. |
13 |
![]() |
Like Utah, they're being dinged a bit for squeaking by a shaky opponent (Texas Tech) |
14 |
![]() |
They haven't really played anyone yet but I'm ranking them high for roster / schedule reasons. |
15 |
![]() |
Really looked good in their wins I thought, but they haven't played anyone very impressive. |
16 |
![]() |
Mad at them for beating Tulane |
17 |
![]() |
I think KU is gonna shock some people this year. Their offense has looked stellar through two games, and the defense is improved from last year. A little bit of a homer pick though tbh. |
18 |
![]() |
I think you should always assume KSU is gonna be at least a solid team. |
19 |
![]() |
Credit for beating Jimbo |
20 |
![]() |
They looked legit good against Clemson, I think they will contend for the ACC unless they have KU-esque turbulence midway through. |
21 |
![]() |
They looked like total ass through 6 quarters but then seemed to remember how to play football. Kinda stumped on this one. |
22 |
![]() |
Nice W over Wisconsin, I think there's a decent chance they rocket up to join the rest of the PAC-12, I just think their schedule will limit them. |
23 |
![]() |
Not sold on this OU team yet. Defense is a hesitant "so far so good", but the offense is just too anemic and spotty to reliably 10ish in games in the Big 12. |
24 |
![]() |
Squeaked by a good App State team. Not too mad at them for it but still. |
25 |
![]() |
I'm probably being too mean, but they totally quit in the third quarter against FSU. That doesn't bode well in my eyes. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.95 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.20 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.50 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
4.96 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
2.77 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.41 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.47 |