Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 6, 2022, 6:40 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Resume, Quality wins, eye test
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
LW: 3 |
2 |
![]() |
LW: 2 |
3 |
![]() |
LW: 1, Cupcake game, sliding due to UGA/OSU having big wins over better comp. |
4 |
![]() |
LW: 5 |
5 |
![]() |
LW: 7 |
6 |
![]() |
LW: 6 |
7 |
![]() |
LW: 9 |
8 |
![]() |
LW: 12 |
9 |
![]() |
LW: 25, huge win over Cincinnati, one of the best wins among FBS to this point |
10 |
![]() |
LW: 8 |
11 |
![]() |
LW: 14 |
12 |
![]() |
LW: 16 |
13 |
![]() |
LW: 15 |
14 |
![]() |
LW: NR |
15 |
![]() |
LW: 10, defense very suspect, but dominated early on |
16 |
![]() |
LW: 17 |
17 |
![]() |
LW: 19 |
18 |
![]() |
LW: 18 |
19 |
![]() |
LW: 21 |
20 |
![]() |
LW: 4, appears to have been very overrated, time will tell their true worth |
21 |
![]() |
LW: 11, very poor performance against ECU, too much hype? |
22 |
![]() |
LW: 23, we should know more about this team once they play Vanderbilt, QB situation will be interesting to watch unfold |
23 |
![]() |
LW: NR |
24 |
![]() |
LW: 20, down to the wire with a good UTSA team, those that jumped just looked better than they did |
25 |
![]() |
LW: NR, bit of a homer pick, but through 3.5 quarters Travis looks much improved and defense is as good as advertised, big road test against Louisville in week 3 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.14 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.24 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
2.02 |
12 |
![]() |
0.47 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |