Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 6, 2022, 7:13 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Early rankings are hard. I value big wins and talent/expectations roughly equally at this point. As a result, teams thought to be weaker and played and beat tough competition may shoot up in the rankings. This is correct itself as all teams start playing stronger competition. i.e. Georgia and Ohio State both had very impressive wins so they leapfrog Bama. That may change depending how well Bama plays Texas.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
The loss stung but it was still a solid performance. Tough to say how far they should fall but they had enough promising moments to keep them ranked. |
24 |
![]() |
It pained me to rank. But I think Texas has the talent to go far this year. |
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.14 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.10 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.07 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.53 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.79 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.38 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.38 |
21 |
![]() |
0.10 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.37 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.46 |
![]() |
0.45 |
![]() |
0.29 |
Total Score: 4.05