Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Oct. 23, 2022, 4:37 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 9 notes: Deservedness keeps teams such as Texas out when I would have them over some of the teams in this poll. General: 1st layer, computer portion: SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. 2nd layer, human portion: home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). 3rd layer, human portion: wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. 4th layer, computer portion: Deservedness = team cannot be ranked over another team with 2+ fewer losses (ex: 5-3 Texas cannot be ranked over 5-1 Coastal Carolina even if rankings have Texas over Coastal Carolina and/or I think Texas is better than Coastal Carolina).
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Has done everything to warrant the #1 ranking |
2 |
![]() |
No change - result as expected |
3 |
![]() |
No change - result as expected |
4 |
![]() |
No change - result as expected |
5 |
![]() |
No change - bye week |
6 |
![]() |
No change - result as expected |
7 |
![]() |
No change - result as expected |
8 |
![]() |
Not much room to climb |
9 |
![]() |
Should not get dinged for winning a close game against one of the base top 25 teams before Deservedness |
10 |
![]() |
Computer and human portions are somewhat close to each other individually. Surprised the computer portion still has them high even with a 2 TD loss |
11 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them higher, human portion has Utah above them |
12 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them much lower, but they’ve been a much better team since getting Hartman back |
13 |
![]() |
If I had to guess, they’ll still be in about the same relative spot if they lose to Ohio State next week |
14 |
![]() |
Loss to Florida keeps looking more and more like a week 1 thing |
15 |
![]() |
Close loss to one of the top teams while on the road shouldn’t be penalized too much |
16 |
![]() |
FSU is still a top team (kept off due to Deservedness) and loss to Tennessee is more justified |
17 |
![]() |
Their third straight week falling. LSU’s a talented team, but they might not climb if they keep starting slow and waiting for teams to screw up instead of going out and proactively winning games |
18 |
![]() |
One of the rare times a team rises in rankings after a loss when Deservedness isn’t a factor for them. They don’t have a great computer computer or human portion, but have got the job done through 2/3 season so far |
19 |
![]() |
Looks like the team might drop some if they keep winning close games, but they are higher up than Syracuse in computer portion |
20 |
![]() |
They’ll have tests against a feisty Nebraska, maybe-healthier Michigan State, and rough Purdue team in the next few weeks |
21 |
![]() |
Computer portion: not great. Human portion: cock good enough. Deservedness keeping Texas out |
22 |
![]() |
On thin ice with the Southern Miss loss. Deservedness keeping Texas out |
23 |
![]() |
Ranking seems to depend on Notre Dame situation. Deservedness keeping Texas out |
24 |
![]() |
Not sure what’ll happen to them if they lose big time Tennessee. Deservedness keeping Texas out |
25 |
![]() |
SMU is a decent-enough opponent and computer portion has them higher up, but they’ve been playing everyone close this season and need to dominate if they want to climb rankings. They would be out of top 25 if NC State still had Leary and/or Texas had 2 losses. Next five (alphabetical): Maryland, NC State, South Alabama, Troy, Washington |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.08 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.77 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.35 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
1.20 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
-0.22 |
19 |
![]() |
2.80 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.29 |
21 |
![]() |
1.43 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.51 |