Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2022, 8:55 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Heavily relying on Beta_Rank (sharpcollegefootball.com) but adjusting for actual wins/losses. IMO this is a good compromise of weighing how good a team is vs what they've actually accomplished. For example, the model loves LSU and Mississippi State, but they have 1 loss, so they should be punished for that. They are clearly the best 1 loss teams though and should be put ahead of undefeateds with weak resumes. The big omission here is Kentucky, which the model hates. If they start winning in conference play they'll shoot up the rankings.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Beta rank number 1 |
2 |
![]() |
Beta rank number 2 |
3 |
![]() |
Beta rank number 3 |
4 |
![]() |
Bit surprised to see them grab the number 4 spot but hey, they've been impressive |
5 |
![]() |
Not sold on this at all, but I'll trust the math until they drop a game |
6 |
![]() |
Their offense and defensive ratings don't warrant a top 10 spot. As the model continues to phase out offseason data they will continue to slide |
7 |
![]() |
Offense took a hit from the Oregon State game, but their defense got a bump in the ratings |
8 |
![]() |
Surprised they are this low in the model. The model respects Maryland so that was a good win, but their OOC schedule is weighing them down. |
9 |
![]() |
Still a little shaky defensively but beta_rank has this as the 9th best offense, even ahead of USC |
10 |
![]() |
Offense grades out really well |
11 |
![]() |
Model not overly impressed by Penn State, but they're undefeated |
12 |
![]() |
Very little data on this team still, they've only played 2 FBS games |
13 |
![]() |
Beta_rank number 4 |
14 |
![]() |
Beta_rank #5 |
15 |
![]() |
Still undefeated |
16 |
![]() |
Still one of the best 1 loss teams |
17 |
![]() |
Since the Florida loss they've been cruising through an easy schedule |
18 |
![]() |
Being propped up by the 12th ranked offense, which is scary when Bo Nix is the QB. Lots of work to do defensively |
19 |
![]() |
Close loss against a strongly rated Michigan |
20 |
![]() |
Defense grades out at number 5, offense is pretty pedestrian |
21 |
![]() |
Undefeated but meh |
22 |
![]() |
They've played NOBODY. We'll find out what they are against Washington |
23 |
![]() |
They're ok |
24 |
![]() |
I wish some other teams would jump up so I could stop ranking A&M. 104th rated offense. |
25 |
![]() |
I just said fuck it because they've been impressive, and the model doesn't have any preseason data on them so it isn't going to properly rate them for a couple more weeks |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
1.31 |
5 |
![]() |
1.40 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.55 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
5.01 |
14 |
![]() |
10.07 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.03 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
6.03 |
20 |
![]() |
0.97 |
21 |
![]() |
-1.52 |
22 |
![]() |
0.18 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.73 |
![]() |
0.83 |
![]() |
0.33 |
![]() |
0.44 |
![]() |
0.45 |
![]() |
0.23 |
![]() |
0.06 |
Total Score: 33.15