Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2022, 12:48 p.m.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
Win over ND doesn’t look great anymore but I can’t see why anyone besides UGA should be ranked ahead of them now. Bama shoulda lost and Michigan hasn’t played a decent team yet. I still don’t feel like Ohio State deserves this spot tho |
3 |
![]() |
Looked like a top tier team but still hasn’t played a decent opponent yet to warrant a move to #2. Only reason they’re above Bama is because Texas shoulda won |
4 |
![]() |
Shoulda lost but everyone knows Saban will get this Bama team turned around. This same stuff happened last season |
5 |
![]() |
Bad first half good second half. Sorta skeptical tho |
6 |
![]() |
Furman outgained them. Defense looked good tho and they still won 35-12. |
7 |
![]() |
Offense looked great, maybe even elite. Defense still looks lacking and I can’t shake the feeling that this USC team is missing something |
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
Bad first half good second half. I don’t see why Oklahoma can not get punished but Miami has too, so they’re staying in my top 10 |
10 |
![]() |
44-30 doesn’t impress me, but I feel they’re better than Tennessee and the Cincinnati win still looks good. |
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
I honestly wanted to put Texas higher. I don’t know many teams that could’ve played Bama the way they did, much less actually look like the better team. They should’ve won, but they still head into next week with a loss on their record, so I didn’t put them in the top 10 because of that. |
13 |
![]() |
Great win over a Baylor team I thought was great |
14 |
![]() |
Maybe deserve to fall further down but as long as they got the head to head with Utah I won’t move them below them |
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
This team is gonna win the Big 10 West |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
Sleeper team that needs to be getting more attention |
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.05 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.71 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.12 |
12 |
![]() |
1.75 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
1.26 |
15 |
![]() |
0.04 |
16 |
![]() |
0.11 |
17 |
![]() |
2.81 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
1.71 |
20 |
![]() |
0.09 |
21 |
![]() |
-1.26 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.64 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.68 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.55 |
![]() |
0.68 |
![]() |
0.07 |
Total Score: 14.54