Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2022, 11:44 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Human poll relying mostly on Resume, SoS, and MoV. Eye-test used sparingly, and usually only in situations with similar bodies of work for the season.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
I was already high on Texas, and they did win, so im not dropping them out of top 4. Uncharacteristic penalties that are unlikely to show up much more often, but they still happened. If Texas wasnt quite good, they would have dropped lower. |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
Concerned about DJ U, need more data points to accurately place. |
7 |
![]() |
I was high on Baylor, so maybe this is slightly too high for BYU, but Hall has good numbers and the defense played excellently. |
8 |
![]() |
This defense seems Georgia-lite, meant as a complement. Need more data points. |
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
Offense looks phenomenal, mildly worried about defense. I might have USC too low. If they continue winning they will probably rise faster than other teams who continue winning. |
13 |
![]() |
High compared to other peoples opinions, but I truly think theyre a sleeper in the ACC. |
14 |
![]() |
Close win over a decent Pitt program, im unsure of this placement and future results will probably have a larger than average effect on placement if they lose. |
15 |
![]() |
Un-ironic quality loss, the resume dictates they should be lower, but watching the game dictates they should be higher. Personally think the Refs weren't playing favorites, but that they still messed up, and Texas very much could have won this game, "should" only slightly less. |
16 |
![]() |
Im high on Lane Kiffin, unsure about Dart. Need a game against a good team to accurately place. |
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
Kentucky might just be that good, but Richardson really needs to be able to attack through the air. |
20 |
![]() |
I might be biased in thinking Utah should be higher, but they did lose to Florida. Results>My opinion in non-Texas cases. |
21 |
![]() |
Close loss to a very good BYU team. I refuse to drop them out of the top 25, and they should probably be higher. |
22 |
![]() |
Im high on Minnesota, and I believe conference play will prove that they should be higher than 22. |
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Close win against Fresno State, who I believe will be a good team this year. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.05 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.42 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.26 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
1.01 |
16 |
![]() |
0.06 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
0.41 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.46 |
![]() |
0.07 |
Total Score: 2.73