Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Oct. 10, 2022, 10:33 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Composite of FPI, SP+, and accelerated ELO
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
32.1, +2.2 from last week, no position change from last week, 40.0 (1st) in win/loss aELO, 27.3 (1st) in margin of victory aELO. Increase is mainly due to accelerated ELO accounting for 90% of the ranking this week. |
2 |
![]() |
27.9, +1.9, +1, 30.9 (5th), 25.0 (2nd) |
3 |
![]() |
25.8, +2.5, +2, 31.4 (3rd), 23.1 (3rd). The win over Kansas helped their strength of schedule. |
4 |
![]() |
25.4, -2.5, -2, 30.9 (4th), 19.1 (7th). Margin of victory aELO is starting to suffer after another unconvincing win over a Texas school. |
5 |
![]() |
24.5, +8.6, +13, 31.8 (2nd), 18.1 (8th). The Vols are pinballing in these rankings from week to week. The model loves LSU from the Mississippi State win, so Tennessee’s dominating win sees them back in the top 5 for the third time this year. |
6 |
![]() |
23.0, -0.9, -2, 23.4 (14th), 21.2 (5th). Strength of schedule is still holding the Buckeyes back. |
7 |
![]() |
22.7, +1.2, -, 25.4 (12th), 22.8 (4th) |
8 |
![]() |
21.3, +5.7, +12, 28.8 (6th), 15.2 (14th). The model is finally taking them seriously after back-to-back wins over decent teams. |
9 |
![]() |
21.0, +1.7, -, 28.1 (8th), 15.2 (15th) |
10 |
![]() |
20.5, +3.3, +4, 25.7 (11th), 17.5 (10th). The model loved Florida State, so even a 2-point win gives the Wolfpack a substantial boost to their win/loss aELO. |
11 |
![]() |
19.6, +0.2, -3, 25.9 (10th), 13.4 (19th). Their drop this week is due to the success of others, not a fault of their own. |
12 |
![]() |
19.3, +3.7, +7, 24.8 (13th), 14.9 (16th). A solid home win moves the Trojans back in the top 15. |
13 |
![]() |
18.5, -4.7, -7, 21.7 (16th), 14.4 (17th). Their strength of schedule suffered massively this week, with Maryland and Iowa both losing. And then they had to play Indiana. |
14 |
![]() |
18.5, -0.4, -3, 27.6 (9th), 10.6 (30th). The model has not ranked Utah since their loss to Florida, so UCLA’s win over them was only almost enough to counter the strength of schedule hit from Washington’s loss this week. |
15 |
![]() |
18.3, +0.8, -3, 22.1 (15th), 17.2 (12th). Again, their drop is due to the success of others, not a fault of their own. |
16 |
![]() |
18.3, +3.9, +7, 28.2 (7th), 11.2 (28th). Their rise during a bye week is due to a strength of schedule boost from Purdue’s win, as well as aELO counting for 90% of the composite this week versus 75% the previous week. |
17 |
![]() |
17.1, +1.1, -, 12.5 (28th), 20.6 (6th). Their two losses continue to hold them back, but they are now 6th in margin of victory after a dominant performance against now-50th-ranked Oklahoma. |
18 |
![]() |
16.6, -0.4, -2, 16.2 (20th), 17.3 (11th). The model expected them to beat Arkansas, so they only almost countered the strength of schedule hit from LSU’s massive loss. |
19 |
![]() |
16.2, -0.8, -4, 16.2 (21st), 17.7 (9th). Their margin of victory aELO actually improved due to a close loss against now-10th-ranked NC State, so they only dropped a few places. |
20 |
![]() |
15.8, -1.5, -7, 21.2 (17th), 12.6 (22nd). Their first loss comes as a one-score loss to now-3rd-ranked TCU, so they remain in the rankings. |
21 |
![]() |
15.5, -3.6, -11, 15.4 (23rd), 12.6 (22nd). With a blowout loss to now-#5, a win against now-#18, and a 1-point loss to now-#19, LSU drops significantly this week but stays ranked. |
22 |
![]() |
15.4, +0.0, -1, 17.9 (18th), 12.9 (20th). The Ducks did exactly what was expected of them against Arizona. |
23 |
![]() |
14.7, +0.2, -1, 17.3 (19th), 12.8 (21st). K-State maintains with a close road win over Iowa State. |
24 |
![]() |
12.1, NR, 12.6 (27th), 11.8 (23rd). With a gulf between #23 and #24, Purdue’s road win over Maryland earns them a ranking for the first time this year. Their two losses are one-score affairs against now-#9 and now-#16. |
25 |
![]() |
11.7, NR, 13.9 (25th), 10.6 (29th). The Green Wave are now 5-1, with a win over now-#23 Kansas State. Honorable Mention: Texas Tech 11.3 |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.95 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
1.95 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-1.31 |
7 |
![]() |
1.81 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
1.10 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.73 |
13 |
![]() |
-2.24 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.22 |
15 |
![]() |
0.93 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.47 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
5.96 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.99 |
22 |
![]() |
-1.81 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.87 |
24 |
![]() |
0.58 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.49 |
![]() |
0.34 |
![]() |
0.37 |
Total Score: 26.12