Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 18, 2022, 9:25 p.m.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Elite. What else is there to say? |
2 |
![]() |
Holy offense, Toledo! |
3 |
![]() |
Looked good but, I mean, it was ULM. |
4 |
![]() |
Looked good but, I mean, it was UConn. I am BEGGING for them to play someone eventually. But, they haven’t played down to their competition, and that counts for something. |
5 |
![]() |
Looked good but, I mean, it was Arkansas Pine Bluff (and on Big XII Network, so I didn’t watch). I don’t know that they’ve proven anything yet but think their resume is slightly stronger than OU’s. |
6 |
![]() |
Don’t think OU has proven too much yet. Resume is ok at best. Team *looks* worlds better, though. |
7 |
![]() |
Protect Mark Stoops at all costs |
8 |
![]() |
Bobby almost got revenge (for something he screwed up in the first place). Not an encouraging game at all. Hopefully it was a trap game they managed to escape, or conference play will be ugly. |
9 |
![]() |
Looking like the team I thought the would, just not sure how they’ll fare in the grinder of the B1G. Defense is legit. |
10 |
![]() |
Looked good but, I mean, it was Akron. Next week is the real test. Is the defense good enough to slow down Richardson? South Florida’s was… |
11 |
![]() |
Beat an opponent they should’ve beaten. Think this is as tough a team as ever. Will be interested to see if they dominate a PAC-12 that is looking surprisingly good. |
12 |
![]() |
I mean, I think this is a good team? I really do. This is a ranking that I think the team will justify as the season goes on. I’ve been wrong before though. |
13 |
![]() |
I’d like them to suck. They don’t. Still want to see it against a good team, though. Starting to worry they’ll still put up 50 no matter who they play. But how many points will they allow? |
14 |
![]() |
Is DeBoer the early favorite for COTY??? What is happening? How bad was Lake? |
15 |
![]() |
Fire up the chainsaws. This is a tough football team. Is the PAC-12 actually good! ? Wondering who will survive and come out on top on that conference. |
16 |
![]() |
Need to see them play somebody, but they’ve been better than I thought they’d be this year even against cupcakes. |
17 |
![]() |
Maybe Georgia is just *that* good and we need to stop sleeping on Oregon |
18 |
![]() |
I saw the final score. The game was uglier than that. This is a *bad* offense, and I say that as an Iowa fan. |
19 |
![]() |
I still don’t believe in this team but they haven’t lost yet, either. Still waiting for them to look dominant, but Tech is a good team that they came close to really dominating. Have to give them credit. |
20 |
![]() |
Need to look better moving forward. 2 picks for Hartman (what he threw against Liberty) won’t cut it. |
21 |
![]() |
This is where the team deserves to be ranked with good QB play. With Ewers, they may be downright scary. I am afraid we’re moving towards “back” status, but I’ve been down this road before and will need to see it to believe it. |
22 |
![]() |
Shaky start, better finish. |
23 |
![]() |
Ibrahim for Heisman? No, really, shouldn’t we at least talk about it? I know they haven’t really played anyone yet, but it will be really interesting to see if he (and the team) continues to have this kind of success in conference play. He has the tools to be one of (if not the) best backs in the B1G, and that’s saying something. |
24 |
![]() |
Hard to ignore what they’ve done so far. At the same time, I don’t think they’re the 24th best team— or at least, I don’t think they will be by the end of the season. Until then, I’m willing to let this ranking play itself out. |
25 |
![]() |
Offense!!! Jalen Daniels for Heisman? Again, I’m being serious. That offense looks legit. Will it continue in conference play? Well, it kind of has with WVU and Houston! Very impressive start for the Jayhawks and Leipold. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.49 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.27 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.86 |
12 |
![]() |
1.24 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.28 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
1.62 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.30 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.38 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
1.11 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.07 |
![]() |
0.40 |
![]() |
0.02 |
Total Score: 8.04