Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2019, 8:04 p.m.
Overall Rationale: My poll is a hybrid. I take the results of a computer poll of my own creation and split the teams into tiers based on where it makes sense to break the values. I then look at just the teams within the tiers and re-rank within them based on my observations and feelings of the teams.Computer poll has a preseason component and a performance-based component. I phase the preseason component out as the season goes along. For this week, the preseason component is still 70% of the overall calculation.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Aa: Only team in Tier |
2 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ab: Only team in Tier |
3 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ac: Only team in Tier |
4 |
![]() |
1/1 in Tier Ad: Only team in Tier |
5 |
![]() |
1/3 in Tier B: Win over Oregon is most impressive of the team's in this tier, even though it was a close last-second win. |
6 |
![]() |
2/3 in Tier B: Impressive win over Cincinnati after seeming to let up in the 2nd half of their opening game against FAU. Struggled picking between them and Auburn for first in this tier. |
7 |
![]() |
3/3 in Tier B: My computer loves this team, ranking them 5th overall. I hd to bump them to the bottom of the tier though bc they haven't played a well-regarded team yet and struggled in their opener against Tulsa. |
8 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier C: Despite the close 2OT win over Army, they are a well-regarded team. Notre Dame has only played one game and they weren't exactly impressive in it, so going with Michigan ahead of them. |
9 |
![]() |
2/2 in Tier C: Less data points than most other teams with the bye this weekend. As a result, Michigan is bumped ahead of them for now. |
10 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier D: Despite Oregon's quality loss, it's easy to go with the undefeated Sooners ahead of them. |
11 |
![]() |
2/2 in Tier D: See Oklahoma explanation. |
12 |
![]() |
1/5 in Tier E: Rewarding Wisconsin for having yet to give up a point through two games. Will learn a lot more about them this weekend against Michigan though. |
13 |
![]() |
2/5 in Tier E: Struggled in the 1st half against Buffalo, which puts them behind the Badgers. |
14 |
![]() |
3/5 in Tier E |
15 |
![]() |
4/5 in Tier E |
16 |
![]() |
5/5 in Tier E |
17 |
![]() |
1/2 in Tier F: Utah has played a slightly more challenging schedule than UCF, giving them the edge for now. |
18 |
![]() |
2/2 in Tier F |
19 |
![]() |
1/4 in Tier G: Big win over Stanford this past weekend puts them at the top of this tier. |
20 |
![]() |
2/4 in Tier G: Don't really know who they are until they play a more well-regarded team. Going with get for now in this slot. |
21 |
![]() |
3/4 in Tier G: Same as the rationale given for Washington State. |
22 |
![]() |
4/4 in Tier G: Given up double digit points to what should be significantly inferior opponents. This puts them at the bottom of this tier. |
23 |
![]() |
1/3 in Tier H: Despite loss to Clemson, they still seem to be the best team in this tier. |
24 |
![]() |
1/3 in Tier H: Unimpressive in win over Marshall |
25 |
![]() |
3/3 in Tier H: Happy El Assico Week! |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.04 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.50 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
1.94 |
8 |
![]() |
0.52 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
-0.44 |
11 |
![]() |
0.78 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.41 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
4.88 |
17 |
![]() |
-0.71 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.98 |
22 |
![]() |
0.44 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.30 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.76 |
![]() |
0.57 |
![]() |
0.09 |
Total Score: 17.36