Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Nov. 14, 2023, 9:59 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Hybrid Poll, with some "eye test" if I think game flow/game control doesn't track with algorithm output.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Would now have UGA favored head to head at a neutral site against anyone by more than 3... incredible team, now rounding into form. They can win games in anyway that a situation may require. |
2 |
![]() |
Obviously very good, but have not be tested by a single dynamic WR, have not had to chase a game and throw the ball yet either. Can't wait to see the game against Ohio St. |
3 |
![]() |
See above. I think Ohio St is a lot like Penn St but with much much better skill positions. |
4 |
![]() |
I love this team, I totally buy the rumors of Lanning being the replacement for Saban when he retires. |
5 |
![]() |
I think this team is kinda flawed but trusting the algorithm here. |
6 |
![]() |
I'd have take Oregon -8.5 on a neutral site... very good team, but have shown some weakness on the lines. They could be in trouble against Oregon St. |
7 |
![]() |
Survived a rocky start, but this team is rolling and putting up impressive numbers |
8 |
![]() |
Of course won head-to-head with Texas, but Alabama has been much more impressive since then. |
9 |
![]() |
Rumors of the SEC's demise were premature, this team is old as hell, must be an avg. age of like 23, but it's starting to show, they are good. |
10 |
![]() |
Can't believe how ahead of schedule this team is, even better than I would have expected from year 4-5 of Brohm. Vibes are great, even if they lose the ACC (likely) a win against UK will send the vibes into the stratosphere in the Ville |
11 |
![]() |
Really good, really tough, great coaching job this season. They have a great shot to knock off Washington at home. |
12 |
![]() |
Still an explosive team even after rough losses, put up great numbers |
13 |
![]() |
I'm downgrading this team a lot from where the algo puts them. The offense simply can't do anything against good teams. |
14 |
![]() |
Boy they are clearly not ready to play with elite teams... |
15 |
![]() |
Really good despite the one-score games. Still have them over JMU because I think the AAC is still a good bit tougher than the SBC across the board. |
16 |
![]() |
See above. Obviously great and will keep getting better. (Future ACC team?) |
17 |
![]() |
Eh... |
18 |
![]() |
Hot right now, capable of a lot, but the bad start is weighing them down |
19 |
![]() |
so up and down. |
20 |
![]() |
good tough team, would like to have seen them with their starting QB this year. too limited on offense to be higher. |
21 |
![]() |
one-sided team, but that one side has the (should be) heisman favorite. |
22 |
![]() |
incomplete team. This team with Hooker as QB would be a serious contender. |
23 |
![]() |
Great D, not as complete as JMU |
24 |
![]() |
MAC kinda stinks, but I really like what they are doing. |
25 |
![]() |
being forgiving of the QB injuries. They are still really good, LL is an elite coach |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
1.01 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.21 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.38 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.22 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.22 |
18 |
![]() |
0.04 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.50 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
1.62 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.85 |
![]() |
0.11 |
![]() |
0.27 |
Total Score: 5.44