Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Oct. 2, 2022, 4:35 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 6 notes: Deservedness keeps Texas, Baylor out when I would have them in my general top 25. I expect to see them back in the list if/when JMU, Syracuse, Coastal Carolina and other undefeated lose. General: 1st layer, computer portion: SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. 2nd layer, human portion: home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). 3rd layer, human portion: wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. 4th layer, computer portion: Deservedness = team cannot be ranked over another team with 2+ fewer losses (ex: 2-2 App State cannot be ranked over 4-0 Coastal Carolina even if rankings have App State over Coastal Carolina and/or I think App State is better than Coastal Carolina).
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Might drop if they struggle and Bryce is out for a long time |
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
Two consecutive struggles |
4 |
![]() |
Two consecutive ranked wins |
5 |
![]() |
Drop a bit due to Iowa game, but might bump up if Georgia continues to struggle |
6 |
![]() |
Might roll for a while |
7 |
![]() |
Solid road win vaults pushes them up |
8 |
![]() |
I don’t think they should be this high, but letting the computer portion roll for now - LSU game will be a good indicator |
9 |
![]() |
Good wins after a horrible week 1 that seems like it could’ve been closer had the game occurred this week |
10 |
![]() |
A close loss on the road to the #4 team shouldn’t drop them |
11 |
![]() |
Auburn and Northwestern wins aren’t as great |
12 |
![]() |
A close loss on the road to the #6 team shouldn’t drop them |
13 |
![]() |
Solid win + close loss to #5 team |
14 |
![]() |
I think this is too high, but letting it roll for now |
15 |
![]() |
Due to both team’s schedules, game with Utah will most likely have them drop or stay even with a close loss |
16 |
![]() |
Due to both team’s schedules, game with Utah will most likely have them drop or stay even with a close loss |
17 |
![]() |
Good wins hinge on Oklahoma recovering and SMU beating UCF. SMU was big rivalry game so I allow close margins to not affect ranking movement much. |
18 |
![]() |
Somewhat close loss to #13 wouldn’t normally drop them, but the rise is due to 1-loss teams losing, becoming 2-loss teams, and unable to be ranked over any 0-loss teams |
19 |
![]() |
Struggled versus Auburn, but Auburn is still talent and LSU still exceeding expectations |
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
Loss to Arkansas doesn’t look as good, but Arkansas still was and is a solid team even if they can’t be ranked due to deservedness factor |
22 |
![]() |
Close road loss to #5 shouldn’t penalize them. Wouldn’t normally have them ranked, but deservedness pushed a few teams out. |
23 |
![]() |
Wouldn’t normally have them ranked, but deservedness pushed a few teams out. |
24 |
![]() |
Wouldn’t normally have them ranked, but deservedness pushed a few teams out. |
25 |
![]() |
Wouldn’t normally have them ranked, but deservedness pushed a few teams out. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.40 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.60 |
10 |
![]() |
1.08 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.27 |
13 |
![]() |
0.07 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.89 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
1.84 |
19 |
![]() |
0.53 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.33 |
22 |
![]() |
0.92 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.12 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-1.32 |