Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2022, 6:36 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Did not do a full re-rank: took Week 3, updated for performances that dramatically changed my perception of a team and cut some overcorrections out of the mix. I am using advanced metrics less than in years past, but I consult FPI and to a lesser extent SP+ to make judgments. All feedback on rationale is welcome, especially if you think I got it wrong or overlooked some x-factor that contributed to a win or loss. Primary source for roster info is Athlon. More predictive than resume-based.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Evaporated South Carolina on the road. I thought South Carolina was bad, but not that bad. |
2 |
![]() |
Toledo's got a dude at quarterback, and otherwise this would have been a shutout. No change. |
3 |
![]() |
I had Oklahoma and the under. Both cashed...but that under made me sweat. |
4 |
![]() |
Nobody watched this football game. |
5 |
![]() |
I actually watched this football game. I hope Connecticut got a big check. |
6 |
![]() |
Bud Elliott thinks USC's defense is a bottom-half group in FBS. I'm not sure whether I would go that far, because both Stanford and Fresno State have significant upside on offense, but it's not above average. |
7 |
![]() |
Penn State opened at #11 for me and people ripped my head off. Maybe y'all are gonna listen to me from now on? |
8 |
![]() |
ASU as a win looks bleh, and I hate Spencer Sanders so very much. But they didn't have to try very hard this week. |
9 |
![]() |
This offense is embarrassing, and I do not have any faith in Dabo to be ruthless with his offensive staff. They're still much too physical to do any worse than 9-3. |
10 |
![]() |
I still think Arkansas is a really good team, but they're here more out of the lack of other candidates than anything else. |
11 |
![]() |
San Diego State is pretty underwhelming, but Utah treated them like it. Nice that they held up against a team that runs the ball, but SDSU does not have the lateral quickness of a Florida so this wasn't much of a test. |
12 |
![]() |
This is one where the Pack lost the box score -- Tech outgained them overall and per play, and lost because of poor third down efficiency and turnovers, which aren't especially repeatable. I think Texas Tech might be quite good, so I'm not moving either team very far in my rankings. But NC State has to figure out this playcalling. |
13 |
![]() |
They just evaporated Colorado, but that says more about CU's current level of "over it" than it does about the Gophers. I do think Minnesota is likely to win the Big Ten West, and if you got that bet in before the season you would have gotten phenomenal value. |
14 |
![]() |
This might be too high or too low. I'm open to either interpretation, but I sort of have them indexed to "about as good as Pitt, maybe a little better," so I'm excited to see what happens this week. Pleasantly surprised by the balance from them so far. |
15 |
![]() |
Bo Nix still is not good, and you can't fool me with isolated good performances -- Oregon outclasses BYU in talent just about everywhere on the field, and it showed. |
16 |
![]() |
I don't think Will Levis is that good. Jake Locker vibes. But UK has been reliably good for a couple years now and I think putting them any lower would be unfair to the rest of this team. |
17 |
![]() |
They paddled Michigan State, but I was one of the only voters who started the year with MSU unranked, so there's a limit to how high I can elevate them for this. I do think Washington has ten-win upside, no doubt. |
18 |
![]() |
Starting to show serious injury concerns, but the talent and coaching are there to win the ACC again if they can just start catching a few breaks. |
19 |
![]() |
People are making really sweeping statements about how they would be better with Ewers, and maybe that's true, but how do we know that? From a blowout of a bad Monroe team and one (1) quarter of action against Alabama that resulted in no touchdowns? I think they're just good-but-not-great and I don't think QB is the X-factor. |
20 |
![]() |
Colorado State is a bad football team, but Wazzu absolutely choked the life out of them on defense and this game was over at halftime, which is what you would expect from a borderline top-25 team in a dress rehearsal-type OOC game. Fun to watch. |
21 |
![]() |
Cincinnati looks like a second-half team this year, and that's okay, but they didn't really blow away Miami OH this week. I just don't think they have "it" this year, but they still feel as good as SMU and better than Tulane or UCF, so their conference and NY6 odds remain decent. |
22 |
![]() |
I guess? I mean, this game did not show me a ton of reason to be optimistic that the offense is going to get better maybe ever, but in a matchup of two coaching staffs that hate modern football and refuse to be good at it, Texas A&M convinced me their talent is going to squash inferior teams despite their scheme. |
23 |
![]() |
This schedule is not good enough to really tell me anything meaningful about Ole Miss, but they handled Georgia Tech better than Clemson did, and a soft T-25 bubble doesn't leave me a lot of options here, so I'll take a flier on them maybe being good enough to beat Kentucky in Oxford. |
24 |
![]() |
Here because of strong preseason projections. To stay here next week, I need to see Wazzu stay within roughly two scores of Oregon, and Wisconsin beat Illinois by double digits. |
25 |
![]() |
I went out on a limb for Tech and so far they've rewarded me. They dominated Houston on the line of scrimmage, and hung tough with what I think is a very good NC State. But they are not going to be a good team and maybe not even a bowl team if they stick with Donovan Smith, who simply does not have P5-caliber decisionmaking yet. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.21 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.25 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.86 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
1.88 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.06 |
16 |
![]() |
-1.05 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
1.80 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.15 |
21 |
![]() |
1.76 |
22 |
![]() |
0.05 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.85 |
24 |
![]() |
0.93 |
25 |
![]() |
0.23 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.63 |
![]() |
0.48 |
![]() |
0.07 |
![]() |
0.40 |
![]() |
0.07 |
Total Score: 11.75