Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2018, 7:05 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Good wins/bad losses are beginning to shape themselves more, as MOV falls more into the background. I am going to look at road wins, and teams with losses will start entering the rankings now, because there's not 25 undefeated teams. If you have any more questions, respond to the comment I post in the r/CFB poll thread or /u/ me in the poll thread. I'm happy to answer them. Or get yelled at infinitely. Won't be quite as happy if the 2nd one happens but i'll still answer your questions.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Crushing everyone, they don't have any explicitly good win but all teams they've played have been at least .500. I guess Ole Miss is a fairly good win. Either way Bama is god and #1. |
2 |
![]() |
No good win, TCU is 2-2, everyone else they've played is 1-3. They have beaten everyone by at least 10 points, though. Win against TCU was on the road which boosts it. |
3 |
![]() |
The OT game against App State is slightly unsettling even though App State is 2-1, resume isn't enough to get past OSU. |
4 |
![]() |
Good wins on the road against SCar and Missouri plus good MOV get them into the top 5. |
5 |
![]() |
Wins against 3-1, 2-1 and FCS teams at home and a win against a 3-1 team on the road get LSU up to here. |
6 |
![]() |
2 wins against 3-1 teams, including 1 on the road, and a win over a 2-2 team get them to here. Blew out their FCS opponent too. Not higher because of not great MOV. |
7 |
![]() |
Nothing especially special, wins against 2-2, 1-2 on the road, 0-3 and 2-2. MOV isn't great but the resume is better than Kentucky. |
8 |
![]() |
2 wins against 3-1 teams is good, including 1 on the road, and Kentucky gets up to here because of that. MOV isn't that good though, and outside of that they've only beaten a 1-3 team and blew out an FCS team. Keeps them here. |
9 |
![]() |
Road wins against 3-1 and 1-2 teams, and home wins against 2-2 and FCS teams. Not quite enough to get past Kentucky though with their MOV being kinda weak. |
10 |
![]() |
Wins against 3-1, 2-2 and 1-3 teams at home and a 2-2 team on the road get them to here. Not great MOV keeps them below Duke. |
11 |
![]() |
Good wins, decent MOV, not good enough though to get past ND. Why do I make these explanations anyway if they're going to be this short? Maybe I should re-make these later. |
12 |
![]() |
Good MOV, decent wins. Gets em here. |
13 |
![]() |
Wins aren't that good, home against 1-3, road against 1-3, road against 1-2, home against FCS. Good MOV but not enough to get any higher. |
14 |
![]() |
MOV is slightly worse than UCF, wins are slightly better, enough to get past them, and also Buffalo. |
15 |
![]() |
Wins over 2 2-2 teams, 1 on the road and a blowout win over a 1-3 team on the road, along with a home blowout win against an FCS team gets them above UCF. Not quite enough to get past WVU though. |
16 |
![]() |
Home blowout wins against 2-2 FAU and FCS SC State and a road blowout of UConn can't get them much higher than this. I'm not sure how much the UNC game would've helped, but probably some because they would have another win. |
17 |
![]() |
Wins over a 2-2 team on the road, and 1-2, 1-3 and FCS teams at home. Not spectacular MOV, but is enough to get past NC State. |
18 |
![]() |
Similar to UCF, but slightly better wins and much worse MOV. Knocks them below USF too. |
19 |
![]() |
Wins against 3-1, 1-2 and FCS teams without great MOV get them to here. 3-1 win was on the road, but still not a great resume. |
20 |
![]() |
Wins against 0-3, 1-3, 1-2 and FCS teams aren't great, and the MOV isn't exactly solid outside of Alabama A&M. Keeps them down here. |
21 |
![]() |
Blowout win against a 1-4 team, close win against an 0-3 team, blowout win against an FCS team. Not great, leaves them down here. |
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.02 |
3 |
![]() |
1.16 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.96 |
9 |
![]() |
1.11 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
-2.29 |
12 |
![]() |
2.98 |
13 |
![]() |
4.03 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
4.82 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
1.55 |
18 |
![]() |
2.71 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
2.63 |
21 |
![]() |
0.28 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
1.63 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.98 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.19 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.73 |
![]() |
2.58 |
![]() |
1.57 |
![]() |
1.04 |
![]() |
0.61 |
![]() |
0.48 |
![]() |
0.16 |
![]() |
0.15 |
Total Score: 36.65