Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 18, 2018, 1:03 a.m.
Overall Rationale: More changes to my algorithm. Which make some improvements, but its far from perfect. I suspect now that I value wins over cupcakes a bit too much. See number 24. It's really hard to properly value every game. Points of note:Alabama: No matter how many times I tweak my early season rankings, Bama is always #1.Oklahoma State: Good team, top 5 is a bit much.Oklahoma: The close win vs ISU and UCLA kinda not being good is holding OU down a bit. Iowa. I am happy to see Iowa ranked here unlike in the AP poll, but top 15 seems high. TAMU: Eh, a bit high. I would put us around 20.BSU: I think they deserve to be ranked still, but maybe 20-25.Minnesota: I'm excited to see them ranked now!North Dakota State Bisons! An FCS team? That's kinda cool and they are legit, but I'm a bit skeptical.Wisconsin: Wisconsin fell to #27. Not sure that was deserved.
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
1.37 |
5 |
![]() |
0.64 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.38 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.43 |
10 |
![]() |
0.10 |
11 |
![]() |
2.60 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.19 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
1.58 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
3.89 |
18 |
![]() |
-0.31 |
19 |
![]() |
2.34 |
20 |
![]() |
-1.66 |
21 |
![]() |
2.15 |
22 |
![]() |
3.07 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
1.23 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.76 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.71 |
![]() |
0.63 |
![]() |
0.32 |
![]() |
0.40 |
Total Score: 25.42