Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 8, 2024, 10:56 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Early season rankings are based largely on expected results versus other ranked teams, and as the season goes leans more heavily on actual resume. By the end of the season, rankings are based entirely on resume. I lean heavily into head to head results and results against common opponents. I also sort teams into 6 tiers based on championship/playoff likelihood. Tier 1: Championship Frontrunners, near lock to make playoffs Tier 2: Championship Contenders with excellent chance of making playoffs Tier 3: Decent possibility to make playoffs, unlikely to compete for championship Tier 4: Outside playoff shot Tier 5: Unlikely to make playoffs but not quite eliminated Tier 6: No shot at playoffs
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Tier 1. |
2 |
![]() |
Tier 1. Possibly must impressive win of the season so far. Only Georgia over Clemson is close. |
3 |
![]() |
Tier 1. Solid improvement week 1 to 2. |
4 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Struggles with USF a bit concerning but still a very talented team. |
5 |
![]() |
Tier 2. |
6 |
![]() |
Tier 2. |
7 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Two straight weeks struggling with inferior teams drops them 5 spots. |
8 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Bit of a letdown game at home against BG. Still have a solid win and lots of talent. |
9 |
![]() |
Tier 2. Struggled with a pretty bad Houston team. Tough road ahead. |
10 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
11 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
12 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
13 |
![]() |
Tier 3. Solid comeback against a decent Arkansas team. |
14 |
![]() |
Tier 3. |
15 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Solid road win vs a decent Tulane team. |
16 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Didn't look great against Nicholls. |
17 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Texas outclassed them but still a solid team. |
18 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
19 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Solid road win against Iowa. |
20 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Win over GT deserves credit. Offense shows some promise. |
21 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
22 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
23 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
24 |
![]() |
Tier 4. |
25 |
![]() |
Tier 4. Having a road p5 win puts them just a hair over other 2-0 teams and the NIU/ND cluster. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.02 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.74 |
7 |
![]() |
0.23 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
1.15 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.94 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.70 |
17 |
![]() |
0.14 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.11 |
21 |
![]() |
1.82 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.64 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.25 |
![]() |
0.07 |
Total Score: 7.24