Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 8, 2024, 2:01 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Got the model up and running, using a Quiz Bowl seeding structure, spreads and W-L to make a coherent conclusion. A bit reactive during the opening weeks but oh well.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Unsurprisingly, the model overreacted when I told it that they beat Notre Dame. Still... they probably deserved to be ranked? |
2 |
![]() |
Unimpressive, but inertia keeps them here. |
3 |
![]() |
Impressive and inertia. |
4 |
![]() |
" |
5 |
![]() |
" |
6 |
![]() |
What does it see in them? Inertia. |
7 |
![]() |
Not enough inertia. Probably should be higher. |
8 |
![]() |
Eh. |
9 |
![]() |
Eh. |
10 |
![]() |
Basically just a crapshoot for who gets to stand now that FSU's corpse is battered. |
11 |
![]() |
See above. |
12 |
![]() |
My team! Won a terribly ugly match against Northwestern, but because of the mild upset nature was rewarded by a much higher place in a week of mostly poor performances at the top. |
13 |
![]() |
Shooting left and right, coming out on top in a less than glorious end. |
14 |
![]() |
Inertia alone. Hangs on by a thread. |
15 |
![]() |
Maybe BGSU is legit? Or perhaps PSU sucks. |
16 |
![]() |
Remarkably dominant. |
17 |
![]() |
Inertia. |
18 |
![]() |
Needs boost, but isn't going to get it playing Utah State. |
19 |
![]() |
Barely a win, but hang on to that inertia. |
20 |
![]() |
Still hate JMU. |
21 |
![]() |
My other team! CyHawk secured, ranking sniped. Was it a fluke... absolutely not. |
22 |
![]() |
Climb in KSU, nice win over Tulane even if a beat cheap. |
23 |
![]() |
Beats Kansas, seems you can hold your own. |
24 |
![]() |
Unhappily underrated. |
25 |
![]() |
Always overrated. Why did people rank NCSU in the first place? I swear it was just to give UT a quality win. NCSU is bad. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
4.01 |
2 |
![]() |
3.77 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.61 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
2.77 |
7 |
![]() |
-3.96 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
2.64 |
11 |
![]() |
1.75 |
12 |
![]() |
12.83 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
11.16 |
15 |
![]() |
-1.13 |
16 |
![]() |
5.89 |
17 |
![]() |
8.16 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.73 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.25 |
20 |
![]() |
4.88 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
-1.22 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
-0.57 |
25 |
![]() |
-3.81 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.07 |
![]() |
3.03 |
![]() |
1.52 |
![]() |
0.42 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.51 |
![]() |
0.28 |
Total Score: 80.40