Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Nov. 27, 2023, 12:36 a.m.
Overall Rationale: I have two predictive models - one that predicts how many points a team will score and one that predicts if they will win or lose. I simulate every FBS team against each other in each model and average the ranks based on who wins the most and who scores the most/allows the fewest points. Occasionally if there's a team that doesn't make sense based on the eye test I'll adjust or replace them (see notes for details). Other notes for this week: UTSA, UCLA dropped out. For the poll at the end of the regular season I manually adjusted so that undefeated/1-loss P5 teams are always higher than 2-loss teams and 2-loss Big 12/B1G/SEC/Pac-12 teams are ahead of 3-loss teams. I am generally not favoring ACC teams because their SOS has been bad, and after 2 losses I give more judgment calls to the model.
| Rank | Team | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
-2 according to model but clear #1 based on eye test and last week's model |
| 2 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
+2 |
| 3 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
-3 according to model, manually moved up ahead of OSU obviously |
| 4 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
+2 according to model but moved down after loss |
| 5 |
Oregon Ducks
|
+2 according to model but they just don't have convincing enough wins to make me think they're better than the top 4 |
| 6 |
Texas Longhorns
|
+4, you could definitely argue Texas above Oregon based on SOS but I'll let the model decide here to remove my personal bias |
| 7 |
Florida State Seminoles
|
+1, still not passing the eye test but still somehow winning |
| 8 |
Washington Huskies
|
+2 according to model but moved down from last week's rank because they struggled against Wazzu. Pac-12 CCG should be a fun one so let's see how they do |
| 9 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
+3 |
| 10 |
Missouri Tigers
|
+3 according to model but moved up above Notre Dame/LSU |
| 11 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
-2 |
| 12 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
no change according to model, moved up ahead of >2-loss teams |
| 13 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
-1 according to model, moved down farther below 2-loss teams |
| 14 |
LSU Tigers
|
-2 |
| 15 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
+1, Fisch has been impressive |
| 16 |
SMU Mustangs
|
+8, probably overrated but the model really likes them |
| 17 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
-3 |
| 18 |
Kansas State Wildcats
|
-7 |
| 19 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
+1 |
| 20 |
Oregon State Beavers
|
-6 |
| 21 |
Troy Trojans
|
+3 |
| 22 |
Utah Utes
|
+5 |
| 23 |
Kansas Jayhawks
|
+8 |
| 24 |
James Madison Dukes
|
-4 |
| 25 |
Clemson Tigers
|
-3 |
Teams Ranked:
| Rank | Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Georgia Bulldogs
|
0.00 |
| 2 |
Alabama Crimson Tide
|
3.67 |
| 3 |
Michigan Wolverines
|
-0.11 |
| 4 |
Ohio State Buckeyes
|
0.56 |
| 5 |
Oregon Ducks
|
0.00 |
| 6 |
Texas Longhorns
|
0.00 |
| 7 |
Florida State Seminoles
|
-0.77 |
| 8 |
Washington Huskies
|
-1.74 |
| 9 |
Oklahoma Sooners
|
0.54 |
| 10 |
Missouri Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 11 |
Penn State Nittany Lions
|
0.00 |
| 12 |
Ole Miss Rebels
|
0.00 |
| 13 |
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
|
0.66 |
| 14 |
LSU Tigers
|
0.00 |
| 15 |
Arizona Wildcats
|
0.00 |
| 16 |
SMU Mustangs
|
2.14 |
| 17 |
Louisville Cardinals
|
0.00 |
| 18 |
Kansas State Wildcats
|
1.94 |
| 19 |
Tennessee Volunteers
|
2.72 |
| 20 |
Oregon State Beavers
|
0.05 |
| 21 |
Troy Trojans
|
2.51 |
| 22 |
Utah Utes
|
2.55 |
| 23 |
Kansas Jayhawks
|
2.05 |
| 24 |
James Madison Dukes
|
0.00 |
| 25 |
Clemson Tigers
|
0.00 |
Omissions:
| Team | Unusualness |
|---|---|
Tulane Green Wave
|
1.49 |
Iowa Hawkeyes
|
1.64 |
Liberty Flames
|
0.38 |
Oklahoma State Cowboys
|
0.93 |
NC State Wolfpack
|
0.81 |
Toledo Rockets
|
0.47 |
Total Score: 27.72