Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Oct. 17, 2023, 9:44 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Vibes based still
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Washington would be #1 if not for the repeat national champions bonus |
2 |
![]() |
Best resume in the country now |
3 |
![]() |
They are the best looking team so far but have played nobody |
4 |
![]() |
Just gonna keep them up here with Michigan until it's time for them to play (assuming they don't start sucking for some reason) |
5 |
![]() |
They've cooled off but I still have them as the best team in the ACC |
6 |
![]() |
Finally ready to accept that the Sooners might actually be good, which means it's probably time to lose to USF :D |
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
They were a few bad breaks away from beating Washington, #8 is honestly lower than I expect them to finish at |
9 |
![]() |
The rest of their schedule is just as soft as OU's so I don't expect them to move much. |
10 |
![]() |
Ranking them as the third best PAC-12 team due to current resume, but it's gonna be chaos |
11 |
![]() |
Still no bad losses |
12 |
![]() |
One of the least consistent good teams, but still a good team. |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
I keep forgetting they exist but they're only at one loss still |
16 |
![]() |
Not very confident in the Utes without Cam. I still think they can beat USC at least |
17 |
![]() |
It's one thing to have a bad defense, but when your entire team is your offense and you can't get that going, it's not good. |
18 |
![]() |
If USC can be #18 with no defense, Iowa can be #19 with no offense. It's only fair. |
19 |
![]() |
Undefeated for like 20+ games, not bad |
20 |
![]() |
They're kind of fading in the very competitive PAC right now. |
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
I need them to lose again so I can stop ranking them |
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
I just can't figure out how good ND is supposed to be, so I'm leaving them ranked for now on the assumption that ND is pretty good and Louisville must be too because they handled ND well. |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.07 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.44 |
11 |
![]() |
1.09 |
12 |
![]() |
0.35 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.93 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.72 |
15 |
![]() |
0.27 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.33 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
5.17 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
2.61 |
23 |
![]() |
0.34 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.55 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.09 |
![]() |
1.14 |
![]() |
0.11 |
Total Score: 17.22