Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Oct. 30, 2022, 1:56 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 10 notes: Deservedness keeps teams such as Texas out when I would have them over some of the teams in this poll. General: 1st layer, computer portion: SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. 2nd layer, human portion: home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). 3rd layer, human portion: wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. 4th layer, computer portion: Deservedness = team cannot be ranked over another team with 2+ fewer losses (ex: 5-3 Texas can be ranked over 6-2 Syracuse, but Texas cannot be ranked over 7-1 Coastal Carolina even if rankings have Texas over Coastal Carolina and/or I think Texas is better than Coastal Carolina).
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Even though Michigan has a better comparative win against Penn State, one game isn’t enough to knock them off #1 |
2 |
![]() |
Distance between them and #1 shrank |
3 |
![]() |
Score was closer than game actually was |
4 |
![]() |
Bye did nothing to drop them |
5 |
![]() |
Big rivalry games don’t depend on margin of victory |
6 |
![]() |
Bye did nothing to drop them |
7 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them lower |
8 |
![]() |
Four PAC teams are very close together |
9 |
![]() |
Four PAC teams are very close together |
10 |
![]() |
Four PAC teams are very close together |
11 |
![]() |
Four PAC teams are very close together, but USC has had easiest of schedules so far |
12 |
![]() |
Game was much closer than final score. If anything, the loss to Michigan was worse than to Ohio State |
13 |
![]() |
The blowout over Oklahoma State might be a fluke, but beating a ranked opponent with a backup quarterback is impressive and their only two losses are to other teams also ranked |
14 |
![]() |
Not sure what kind of result in the Alabama game could drop LSU |
15 |
![]() |
They might not even move even if they lose to Alabama after the bye week |
16 |
![]() |
Barring a loss to Michigan State, Illinois might not be tested until Purdue or Michigan |
17 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them lower, but they’re only did was against Utah |
18 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them higher. 48-0 loss never looks good, but I’m willing to say this was a very big outlier. If they look like crap, they might continue to drop |
19 |
![]() |
Losing to Notre Dame isn’t as bad as many people think. They’re next three games will truly show who they are |
20 |
![]() |
Louisville is an up and down team, but this could be another situation where a portion of this was a flukey conference situation |
21 |
![]() |
Computer portion has them lower than this. They might be fraudulent, but for now they pass. |
22 |
![]() |
They would be lower if not for Deservedness |
23 |
![]() |
They would be lower if not for Deservedness |
24 |
![]() |
They would be lower if not for Deservedness |
25 |
![]() |
They would be lower if not for Deservedness. Next five would be some combination of Cincinnati, Troy, South Alabama, Washington, and Boise State/UTSA |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.39 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
1.12 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.06 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.03 |
10 |
![]() |
0.49 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.76 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
-0.42 |
16 |
![]() |
-0.19 |
17 |
![]() |
1.81 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.16 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.58 |
22 |
![]() |
-0.40 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |