Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 20, 2021, 4:33 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Welcome to the first season of xsrs-fb, the football version of my xSRS rating formula I used for basketball.Prepare for utter nonsense for the next few weeks.I'm not ranking FCS teams yet due to lack of data. (Montana would be in at #9 otherwise.)
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
Since this is the most obviously fraudulent team here, I might as well explain why my computer model likes them so much. They lost to #1 Michigan and (would-be) #9 Montana close, then beat #70 Arkansas State by more than my margin of victory cap.(Same applies to WMU, who lost to Michigan and beat Pitt.) |
15 |
![]() |
This probably isn't going to be the only computer poll ranking Wyoming this week. Beating MAC teams tends to work surprisingly well for early season strength of schedule. |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
2.14 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
3.20 |
4 |
![]() |
1.29 |
5 |
![]() |
1.90 |
6 |
![]() |
-2.05 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
-0.65 |
9 |
![]() |
-0.92 |
10 |
![]() |
3.02 |
11 |
![]() |
14.13 |
12 |
![]() |
12.93 |
13 |
![]() |
10.93 |
14 |
![]() |
11.21 |
15 |
![]() |
10.14 |
16 |
![]() |
-0.10 |
17 |
![]() |
7.91 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.29 |
19 |
![]() |
3.43 |
20 |
![]() |
2.65 |
21 |
![]() |
4.11 |
22 |
![]() |
-1.37 |
23 |
![]() |
2.19 |
24 |
![]() |
-3.35 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.53 |
![]() |
1.97 |
![]() |
1.88 |
![]() |
1.62 |
![]() |
1.96 |
![]() |
0.91 |
![]() |
0.87 |
![]() |
0.44 |
![]() |
0.19 |
Total Score: 114.75