Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Nov. 24, 2019, 3:51 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked at the end of last year). The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points and all other FCS teams 50 points. For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their Pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.18 |
3 |
![]() |
0.87 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
-3.72 |
7 |
![]() |
1.17 |
8 |
![]() |
0.16 |
9 |
![]() |
0.04 |
10 |
![]() |
1.06 |
11 |
![]() |
0.47 |
12 |
![]() |
5.39 |
13 |
![]() |
0.55 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.43 |
15 |
![]() |
-3.82 |
16 |
![]() |
8.70 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
1.19 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
5.15 |
21 |
![]() |
2.54 |
22 |
![]() |
-3.08 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
1.24 |
25 |
![]() |
0.22 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
4.35 |
![]() |
1.72 |
![]() |
1.57 |
![]() |
0.42 |
![]() |
0.01 |
Total Score: 48.07