Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 23, 2019, 9:12 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Ranked by probability of making the playoffs based on 538's predictive model until teams are below 5% then switches to ranking by Conference champ probability otherwise no G5 teams will show up.  This helps better capture NY6 probability after playoffs become unrealistic/longshot goals for some teams.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
They feel disgustingly low in this model, but at least they make the top 25 unlike Michigan. |
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.29 |
4 |
![]() |
0.04 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.11 |
10 |
![]() |
0.49 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.91 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.19 |
17 |
![]() |
1.07 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.33 |
20 |
![]() |
4.77 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.07 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.98 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.09 |
![]() |
0.21 |
Total Score: 9.55