Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 25, 2017, 1:31 p.m.
Overall Rationale: Individual text boxes dont work for me. So here is all my rationalesBammer- Not sure I trust anyone who doesn't have them #1WARSHINGTON- Looked like the second best team in the country this weekMoneyBoys- is darnold good? His poor decisions will cost you a game. Is tree/texas/cal good? Did it without Ronald thought, so thats pretty good.FatDawg- backup QB and still looked better then most teamsMichigan - same^Gobble- i think they will beat Clemson this week. Have played much more confidently.Too Soon- too close for comfort but still OSU win will keep them near the top.Clempson- no BC is not good. You got some big guys but no stars to take you back to the top.Cuogs - they have won there 3 hardest games of the year watch out the pirate ship has the wind at there backs.Saquon Barkley- this is a team sport. See stanford.Big12 - wish texas was back the big12 would be much simpler.Nutz- yall lost. Be happy your so high with so many 0 loss teams.Wisconsin- there higher then this but i forgot about them. They are an actual team like clemson but not good.Alabama jr- sec bias.Azteca. - the party platters here are great. Hopefuly penny doesnt get hurt cause he is the only cook you got.Lamar Jackson- see penn state.Cowboys- your making me look bad. Stupid big12.Berkeley Bears- why did the announcers insist on calling you that. This is the end of good teams. No cal isnt good but neither is anyone after them. (Good= playoff contender)Wakee! I lied. Wake is probably the second best team in the acc after turkey boys. Asu should play them on Halloween spooky.Miami- Buff- Watch out USC these boys are going to be up on you.Big12- these guys can scorUtes- probably suck but people think your good.Trees - ruff start but this is still the best stanford offense i have seen for a while.Memphis- shoutout to bbq
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
1.09 |
3 |
![]() |
0.47 |
4 |
![]() |
0.52 |
5 |
![]() |
0.29 |
6 |
![]() |
1.40 |
7 |
![]() |
-0.46 |
8 |
![]() |
-4.00 |
9 |
![]() |
1.35 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
-1.58 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.51 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.12 |
15 |
![]() |
0.28 |
16 |
![]() |
0.00 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
6.93 |
19 |
![]() |
2.02 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.92 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.39 |
24 |
![]() |
0.81 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.95 |
![]() |
0.37 |
![]() |
0.29 |
![]() |
0.06 |
![]() |
0.17 |
Total Score: 28.00