Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2017, 5:39 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked).The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points (which they cannot gain or lose but just stay at 75 always) and all other FCS teams 50 points (which again, cannot gain or lose but just stay at 50 points),For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
404 points Up 4 places |
2 |
![]() |
387 points Up 17 places |
3 |
![]() |
362 points up 9 places |
4 |
![]() |
348 points up 5 places |
5 |
![]() |
347 points down 3 places |
6 |
![]() |
310 points up 0 places |
7 |
![]() |
279 points down 3 places |
8 |
![]() |
273 points up 16 places |
9 |
![]() |
268 points down 6 places |
10 |
![]() |
264 points up 5 places |
11 |
![]() |
262 points up 5 places |
12 |
![]() |
252 points up 11 places |
13 |
![]() |
246 points up 13 places |
14 |
![]() |
241 points down 1 place |
15 |
![]() |
238 points down 1 place |
16 |
![]() |
233 points up 11 places |
17 |
![]() |
229 points down 9 places |
18 |
![]() |
226 points up 33 places |
19 |
![]() |
220 points up 1 place |
20 |
![]() |
212 points down 9 places |
21 |
![]() |
208 points up 13 places |
22 |
![]() |
198 points down 5 places |
23 |
![]() |
192 points up 6 places |
24 |
![]() |
190 points up 9 places |
25 |
![]() |
187 points up 31 places |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
1.28 |
3 |
![]() |
0.68 |
4 |
![]() |
0.65 |
5 |
![]() |
-1.54 |
6 |
![]() |
0.06 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
2.99 |
9 |
![]() |
-1.27 |
10 |
![]() |
2.35 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.97 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
4.63 |
15 |
![]() |
-1.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.28 |
17 |
![]() |
3.01 |
18 |
![]() |
2.18 |
19 |
![]() |
4.63 |
20 |
![]() |
-0.35 |
21 |
![]() |
-0.79 |
22 |
![]() |
3.09 |
23 |
![]() |
-0.39 |
24 |
![]() |
1.16 |
25 |
![]() |
0.20 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
1.34 |
![]() |
1.18 |
![]() |
1.28 |
![]() |
1.01 |
![]() |
0.37 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.17 |
Total Score: 39.28