Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2017, 8:56 a.m.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
W over FSU; strong efficiency ratings to date; they are still Bama |
2 |
![]() |
2 top 30 wins; strong performances |
3 |
![]() |
Dominant W over Ohio St; top 3 QB; Lingering questions around coaching with Stoop's departure |
4 |
![]() |
Absolutely elite offense; defense better than expected; waiting for a quality opponent |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
Data and LSU W support top 10; Big question is how good is LSU? |
11 |
![]() |
2 meh wins against WMU and Texas with declining value of Stanford W after their loss to SDSU |
12 |
![]() |
Elite defense so far; questionable offense with the true freshman QB; ND's rushing attack looks increasingly potent in other 2 games; MSU will be a big game to determine whether we are a contender or pretender; |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
Elite defense; Question mark at QB; Remains to be seen how the post-Bama break will affect the team |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
No clue but they have the talent |
18 |
![]() |
W against Kansas St; surprise of the year so far along with Wake Forest |
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
Top 10 in efficiency metrics; Are they real? |
22 |
![]() |
Stanford W |
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.07 |
5 |
![]() |
0.05 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.01 |
10 |
![]() |
0.24 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.57 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.01 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.43 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.77 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.62 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
1.66 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.37 |
![]() |
0.26 |
Total Score: 9.14