Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Sept. 18, 2017, 10:23 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I took the BROHM methodology from u/factorialite but with a few minor changes. First, this ranking system is pretty bad (though amusingly quite good in some ways, a la finding Clemson/OU/Alabama highly ranked).The way BROHM works is I have assigned P5 teams 150 points to start, G5 teams 100 points, FCS Playoff (last year) teams 75 points (which they cannot gain or lose but just stay at 75 always) and all other FCS teams 50 points (which again, cannot gain or lose but just stay at 50 points),For each game, a team contributes half of its points into the game pool (so if a P5 team starts against another P5 team they each contribute 75 points). Then, they take out points based on their pythagorean share in that game (PointsFOR^2/(PointsFOR^2+PointsAGAINST^2)). This way, it's possible for a "bad" team to play a "good" team close and ultimately win points despite losing the game. Alternatively, it is possible for a "good" team to win a game and ultimately lose points to a "bad" team by not beating them by enough.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
340 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
2 |
![]() |
323 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
3 |
![]() |
305 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
4 |
![]() |
283 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
5 |
![]() |
275 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
6 |
![]() |
269 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
7 |
![]() |
268 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
8 |
![]() |
WAKE IS GREAT!!!!!! Also 267 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
9 |
![]() |
264 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
10 |
![]() |
258 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
11 |
![]() |
253 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
12 |
![]() |
245 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
13 |
![]() |
241 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
14 |
![]() |
238 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
15 |
![]() |
235 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
16 |
![]() |
223 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
17 |
![]() |
222 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
18 |
![]() |
221 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
19 |
![]() |
219 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
20 |
![]() |
216 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
21 |
![]() |
211 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
22 |
![]() |
209 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
23 |
![]() |
208 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
24 |
![]() |
207 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
25 |
![]() |
207 Points (BROHM Score Method) |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
2.01 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
-1.00 |
6 |
![]() |
1.87 |
7 |
![]() |
4.06 |
8 |
![]() |
16.62 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
3.09 |
11 |
![]() |
-0.98 |
12 |
![]() |
-0.10 |
13 |
![]() |
5.69 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.70 |
15 |
![]() |
3.41 |
16 |
![]() |
-2.16 |
17 |
![]() |
3.24 |
18 |
![]() |
7.08 |
19 |
![]() |
-1.15 |
20 |
![]() |
1.53 |
21 |
![]() |
0.30 |
22 |
![]() |
0.00 |
23 |
![]() |
-1.93 |
24 |
![]() |
0.91 |
25 |
![]() |
0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
2.24 |
![]() |
1.18 |
![]() |
1.46 |
![]() |
0.89 |
![]() |
0.65 |
![]() |
0.58 |
![]() |
0.30 |
![]() |
0.43 |
![]() |
0.37 |
![]() |
0.26 |
Total Score: 66.22