Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Jan. 22, 2025, 2:11 p.m.
Overall Rationale: I use a self-created metric I dub "Quality Score" to measure how good each win is (or how bad each loss is) for each game, taking into account opponent strength (from ESPN's FPI), location, margin, and adjusted margin (from Bill Connelly).
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
Despite bad losses against elite teams (Texas, Georgia, Miami), big wins against LSU and Tulane in bowl game gave them a big boost |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
Was expecting them to be higher. Had a lot of good wins (BYU at home, KSU on the road) but really their only elite result was blowing out Iowa State in the Big 12 CG, and the Cincinnati loss was pretty bad. |
21 |
![]() |
The South Carolina loss is really bad, but thrashing Mizzou was a great win, plus wins against LSU and Florida at the Swamp. |
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
Yes 6 losses is bad, but each (aside from Notre Dame) was 1 possession. Early win against LSU on neutral field is a big boost. |
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.42 |
4 |
![]() |
0.68 |
5 |
![]() |
-0.26 |
6 |
![]() |
-0.68 |
7 |
![]() |
1.06 |
8 |
![]() |
1.83 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
1.51 |
12 |
![]() |
1.19 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
-0.09 |
15 |
![]() |
9.83 |
16 |
![]() |
4.02 |
17 |
![]() |
2.92 |
18 |
![]() |
-1.97 |
19 |
![]() |
-0.31 |
20 |
![]() |
-3.29 |
21 |
![]() |
3.93 |
22 |
![]() |
1.91 |
23 |
![]() |
2.11 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
3.15 |
![]() |
2.21 |
![]() |
1.11 |
![]() |
0.50 |
![]() |
0.33 |
Total Score: 45.78