Ballot Type: Computer
Submitted: Jan. 21, 2025, 2:46 a.m.
Overall Rationale: 4 Rankings combined: W/L Record, Predicted Wins, Team Strength, Quality of Wins. Full(er) rationale at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1II5aTpECPM6S94RfX8bTlAhNFVAeXKto_bF1YI7wi9U
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State Buckeyes | T2ⁿᵈ W/L, 1ˢᵗ Predicted Wins, 1ˢᵗ Team Strength, 1ˢᵗ Quality of Wins |
2 | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | T2ⁿᵈ W/L, T2ⁿᵈ Predicted Wins, 2ⁿᵈ Team Strength, 2ⁿᵈ Quality of Wins |
3 | Texas Longhorns | T9ᵗʰ W/L, T2ⁿᵈ Predicted Wins, 4ᵗʰ Team Strength, 3ʳᵈ Quality of Wins |
4 | Oregon Ducks | 1ˢᵗ W/L, T2ⁿᵈ Predicted Wins, 9ᵗʰ Team Strength, 9ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
5 | Penn State Nittany Lions | T9ᵗʰ W/L, T2ⁿᵈ Predicted Wins, 8ᵗʰ Team Strength, 6ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
6 | Indiana Hoosiers | T6ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 7ᵗʰ Team Strength, 8ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
7 | Georgia Bulldogs | T11ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 11ᵗʰ Team Strength, 7ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
8 | Army West Point | T4ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 10ᵗʰ Team Strength, 18ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
9 | Ole Miss Rebels | T17ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 3ʳᵈ Team Strength, 4ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
10 | SMU Mustangs | T11ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 16ᵗʰ Team Strength, 14ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
11 | Tennessee Volunteers | T17ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 5ᵗʰ Team Strength, 12ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
12 | Miami Hurricanes | T17ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 13ᵗʰ Team Strength, 11ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
13 | Boise State Broncos | T4ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 23ʳᵈ Team Strength, 24ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
14 | BYU Cougars | T6ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 24ᵗʰ Team Strength, 23ʳᵈ Quality of Wins |
15 | Arizona State Sun Devils | T11ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 17ᵗʰ Team Strength, 26ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
16 | Alabama Crimson Tide | T28ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 6ᵗʰ Team Strength, 5ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
17 | Iowa State Cyclones | T11ᵗʰ W/L, T6ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 25ᵗʰ Team Strength, 25ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
18 | South Carolina Gamecocks | T28ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 12ᵗʰ Team Strength, 13ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
19 | Clemson Tigers | T26ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 26ᵗʰ Team Strength, 16ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
20 | UNLV Rebels | T11ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 30ᵗʰ Team Strength, 28ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
21 | Louisville Cardinals | T28ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 15ᵗʰ Team Strength, 15ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
22 | Colorado Buffaloes | T28ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 21ˢᵗ Team Strength, 20ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
23 | LSU Tigers | T28ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 20ᵗʰ Team Strength, 22ⁿᵈ Quality of Wins |
24 | Memphis Tigers | T6ᵗʰ W/L, T14ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 37ᵗʰ Team Strength, 42ⁿᵈ Quality of Wins |
25 | Navy Midshipmen | T17ᵗʰ W/L, T24ᵗʰ Predicted Wins, 28ᵗʰ Team Strength, 30ᵗʰ Quality of Wins |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State Buckeyes | 0.00 |
2 | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | 0.00 |
3 | Texas Longhorns | 0.42 |
4 | Oregon Ducks | 0.00 |
5 | Penn State Nittany Lions | 0.00 |
6 | Indiana Hoosiers | 0.53 |
7 | Georgia Bulldogs | 0.00 |
8 | Army West Point | 2.37 |
9 | Ole Miss Rebels | 0.43 |
10 | SMU Mustangs | 0.25 |
11 | Tennessee Volunteers | 0.00 |
12 | Miami Hurricanes | 1.18 |
13 | Boise State Broncos | -0.34 |
14 | BYU Cougars | 0.00 |
15 | Arizona State Sun Devils | -1.59 |
16 | Alabama Crimson Tide | 0.00 |
17 | Iowa State Cyclones | 0.00 |
18 | South Carolina Gamecocks | 0.00 |
19 | Clemson Tigers | -0.31 |
20 | UNLV Rebels | 0.31 |
21 | Louisville Cardinals | 1.29 |
22 | Colorado Buffaloes | 1.91 |
23 | LSU Tigers | 0.01 |
24 | Memphis Tigers | 0.00 |
25 | Navy Midshipmen | 0.00 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
Illinois Fighting Illini | 2.21 |
Syracuse Orange | 1.11 |
Missouri Tigers | 0.58 |
Total Score: 14.83