Ballot Type: Hybrid
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2024, 10:05 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Week 9 notes: Deservedness keeping highly-rated 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss behind 0-loss Navy and Army. General notes: FIRST layer (computer portion): SP+, opponents’ SP+, opponents’ opponents’ SP+, opponents’ win %, opponents’ opponents’ win %. SECOND layer (human portion): home/field/away, key injuries, P5/G5 status, watched game factors (ex: offensive/defensive line domination, rush yards after contact, average point of first contact, defensive penetration on non-inside screens, missed tackles, quarterback throwing release speed, overall turnovers, average starting field position, etc). THIRD layer (human portion): wins/losses vs higher-/lower-/non-ranked teams, recency of those results. FOURTH layer (computer portion): Deservedness = Team A cannot be ranked over Team B that has 2+ fewer losses (ex: 9-3 LSU can be ranked over 10-2 Missouri, but 9-3 LSU cannot be ranked over 11-1 Tulane even if LSU beat Tulane heads up, rankings have LSU over Tulane, and/or I think LSU is better than Tulane) unless Team B is giving a X loss allowance to Team A due to significantly fewer P4 games played. Loss allowances come into play when: P5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 games, 10-8=2, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); P5 teams play 6 fewer P5 games than a G5 team (11-1 Syracuse plays 8 P5 teams, 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 teams, 8-2=6, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Syracuse); G5 teams play 10 fewer P5 teams than a P5 team (ex: 9-3 Arizona plays 10 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 10-0=0, 9-3 Arizona can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty); or G5 teams play 2 fewer P5 games than another G5 team (ex: 9-3 Charlotte plays 2 P5 games, 11-1 Liberty plays 0 P5 games, 2-0=2, 9-3 Charlotte can be ranked over 11-1 Liberty). If the game differential exceeds more than 2/6/10/2 in those scenarios, add another loss allowance for each additional P5 game played difference in that scenario.
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #1 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #8 LSU/#9 Tennessee in the Rose Bowl |
2 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #5 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #12 Boise State in the first round |
3 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #5 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #11 Clemson in the first round |
4 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #2 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #7 Texas/#10 Indiana in the Peach Bowl |
5 |
![]() |
+2. Would be the #3 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #6 Penn State/#11 Clemson in the Sugar Bowl |
6 |
![]() |
-5. Would be the #7 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #10 Indiana in the first round |
7 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #8 playoff seed in this scenario, hosting #9 Tennessee in the first round |
8 |
![]() |
+2. Would be the #9 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #8 LSU in the first round |
9 |
![]() |
+3. Would be the #10 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #7 Texas in the first round |
10 |
![]() |
+1. Would be the #4 playoff seed in this scenario, playing the winner of #5 Ohio State/#12 Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl |
11 |
![]() |
-2. Would be the #11 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #6 Penn State in the first round |
12 |
![]() |
+1 |
13 |
![]() |
+1 |
14 |
![]() |
+1 |
15 |
![]() |
+1 |
16 |
![]() |
+3 |
17 |
![]() |
+1 |
18 |
![]() |
-1 |
19 |
![]() |
+1. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army |
20 |
![]() |
+2. Would be the #12 playoff seed in this scenario, playing at #5 Ohio State in the first round |
21 |
![]() |
+2. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army |
22 |
![]() |
+2. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army |
23 |
![]() |
+2. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army |
24 |
![]() |
NEW. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army |
25 |
![]() |
NEW. Deservedness blocking 2-loss teams such as Alabama and Ole Miss from being ranked in front of 0-loss Army. Next 18: Duke, Army, Vanderbilt ((Deservedness loss allowances allowing eligible 2-loss teams such as Vanderbilt to be ranked ahead of 0-loss Liberty), Alabama, Nebraska, Colorado, Ole Miss, Wisconsin, Texas Tech, Cincinnati, Arizona State, Tulane, Georgia Southern, JMU, WKU, Louisiana, Louisiana-Monroe, Liberty |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.18 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.00 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.44 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.00 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
-0.45 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.15 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.28 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
3.12 |
22 |
![]() |
2.64 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
0.04 |
Omissions:
Team | Unusualness |
---|---|
![]() |
0.87 |
![]() |
0.45 |
![]() |
0.33 |
Total Score: 8.94