Ballot Type: Human
Submitted: Sept. 3, 2024, 9:51 a.m.
Overall Rationale: Based on human judgement of wk 1 results factoring preseason ranks to judge team strength
Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
#1 until further notice; they get the benefit of the doubt due to how strong they’ve been recently. |
2 |
![]() |
Started game slow but ramped up vs Akron in a relatively comfortable win |
3 |
![]() |
Showed off firepower on offense and improved secondary as Quinn Ewers made his case for being one of the Heisman favorites passing for 250 yds and 3 tds in the first half. |
4 |
![]() |
Kalen DeBoer had the ride rolling in his opener. |
5 |
![]() |
Hung over 50 on em in the first half. Nuff said |
6 |
![]() |
Did Drew Allar finally get his shit together? |
7 |
![]() |
Struggled a bit to score against a team they should have dispatched easily. |
8 |
![]() |
Good win in ugly game against a Texas A&M team with lots of talent on paper |
9 |
![]() |
Need to get offense fixed before Texas goes to Ann Arbor next week or this game could get ugly. Stays at #9 due to defending champs and talent they still have on roster. |
10 |
![]() |
My favorite to win the big 12; looked solid in wk 1 with Rising back |
11 |
![]() |
Got the job done in a game they should have dominated |
12 |
![]() |
The U might be back after putting Billy Napier on the hot seat |
13 |
![]() |
USC was clutch when they needed to be against LSU, defense also looks improved |
14 |
![]() |
69 points? nice |
15 |
![]() |
No Caleb, no problem |
16 |
![]() |
Iowa actually scored on offense, vaunted defense is as advertised |
17 |
![]() |
If Bowman and Gordon stay healthy this team can make it back to the Big 12 Championship Game |
18 |
![]() |
A team that is in the mix for the Big 12, handled business in wk 1 with a solid run game |
19 |
![]() |
What a game. Arizona offense lit it up through the air, but their defense was not as dominant as they should have been vs UNM |
20 |
![]() |
If Jalon Daniels and Devin Neal stay healthy, Kansas has the talent to contend for the Big 12 championship |
21 |
![]() |
GT might be better than we thought, currently 2-0 and at the top of the ACC rankings |
22 |
![]() |
Lost to a good team in a close game so I’ll keep them ranked, but Weigman looked rough and if that performance continues A&M could quickly drop out of the rankings |
23 |
![]() |
Lost to a talented team in a close one so I’ll keep them ranked. |
24 |
![]() |
Could be the G5 playoff pick |
25 |
![]() |
Looked respectable, really close between them and NC State for this final spot but they had a better performance |
Teams Ranked:
Rank | Team | Unusualness |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
0.00 |
2 |
![]() |
0.00 |
3 |
![]() |
0.00 |
4 |
![]() |
0.00 |
5 |
![]() |
0.06 |
6 |
![]() |
0.00 |
7 |
![]() |
0.00 |
8 |
![]() |
0.00 |
9 |
![]() |
0.00 |
10 |
![]() |
0.07 |
11 |
![]() |
0.00 |
12 |
![]() |
0.00 |
13 |
![]() |
0.00 |
14 |
![]() |
0.00 |
15 |
![]() |
0.00 |
16 |
![]() |
0.61 |
17 |
![]() |
0.00 |
18 |
![]() |
0.00 |
19 |
![]() |
0.00 |
20 |
![]() |
0.00 |
21 |
![]() |
0.00 |
22 |
![]() |
2.20 |
23 |
![]() |
0.00 |
24 |
![]() |
0.00 |
25 |
![]() |
-0.04 |
No major omissions.
Total Score: 2.99